Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:29:14.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On generating functions for the number of invariants of orthogonal tensors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

A. J. M. Spencer
A. J. M. Spencer
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Mechanics, University of Nottingham.
Get access

Summary

Generating functions for the number of linearly independent invariants of a set of tensors under a given group of transformations are given by the theory of group representations. For the full and proper orthogonal groups these generating functions are in the form of definite integrals. The classical theory of algebraic invariants gives generating functions for the number of invariants of tensors under two-dimensional unimodular transformations, these generating functions being algebraic expressions. Because of a correspondence between the two-dimensional unimodular group and the three-dimensional proper orthogonal group, the corresponding generating functions are equivalent. The main result of this paper is an explicit demonstration of this equivalence. In addition, algebraic generating functions for the three-dimensional full orthogonal group are obtained and the use of the algebraic generating functions illustrated by applying them to a third order symmetric tensor.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematika , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , December 1970 , pp. 275 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Pipkin, A. C. and Rivlin, R. S., Arch. Ratl. Mech. Anal., 4 (1959), 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Weyl, H., Theory of groups and quantum mechanics (Methuen, 1931).Google Scholar
3.Murnaghan, F. D., The theory of group representations (Dover, 1963).Google Scholar
4.Boerner, H., Representations of groups (North-Holland, 1963).Google Scholar
5.Smith, G. F., Arch. Ratl. Mech. Anal., 5 (1960), 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Smith, G. F., Arch. Ratl. Mech. Anal., 18 (1965), 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Smith, G. F., Lincei-Memorie Sc. fisiche, ecc. Ser 8, Vol. 9 (1968), 51.Google Scholar
8.Elliott, E. B., An introduction to the algebra ofquantics, 2nd Ed. reprinted (Chelsea, 1964).Google Scholar
9.Smith, G. F., “Syzygies relating isotropic invariants”, Unpublished report, 1966.Google Scholar
10.Littlewood, D. E., Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 50 (1947), 349.Google Scholar
11.Grace, J. H. and Young, A., The algebra of invariants (Cambridge University Press, 1903).Google Scholar
12.Turnbull, H. W., The theory of determinants, matrices and invariants, 3rd Ed. (Dover, 1960).Google Scholar
13.Gurevich, G. B., Foundations of the theory of algebraic invariants (Noordhoff, 1964).Google Scholar
14.Sylvester, J. J., Amer. J. Math, 2 (1879), 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Sylvester, J. J., Amer. J. Math., 2 (1879), 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Sylvester, J. J., Amer. J. Math., 4 (1881), 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Sylvester, J. J., Amer. J. Math., 5 (1882), 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Franklin, F., Amer. J. Math., 3 (1880), 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar