The logic of Bunched Implications, through both its intuitionistic version (BI) and one of its classical versions, called Boolean BI (BBI), serves as a logical basis to spatial or separation logic frameworks. In BI, the logical implication is interpreted intuitionistically whereas it is generally interpreted classically in spatial or separation logics, as in BBI. In this paper, we aim to give some new insights into the semantic relations between BI and BBI. Then we propose a sound and complete syntactic constraints based framework for the Kripke semantics of both BI and BBI, a sound labelled tableau proof system for BBI, and a representation theorem relating the syntactic models of BI to those of BBI. Finally, we deduce as our main, and unexpected, result, a sound and faithful embedding of BI into BBI.

We investigate laws for predicate transformers for the combination of non-deterministic choice and (extended) probabilistic choice, where predicates are taken to be functions to the extended non-negative reals, or to closed intervals of such reals. These predicate transformers correspond to state transformers, which are functions to conical powerdomains, which are the appropriate powerdomains for the combined forms of non-determinism. As with standard powerdomains for non-deterministic choice, these come in three flavours – lower, upper and (order-)convex – so there are also three kinds of predicate transformers. In order to make the connection, the powerdomains are first characterised in terms of relevant classes of functionals.

Much of the development is carried out at an abstract level, a kind of domain-theoretic functional analysis: one considers d-cones, which are dcpos equipped with a module structure over the non-negative extended reals, in place of topological vector spaces. Such a development still needs to be carried out for probabilistic choice per se; it would presumably be necessary to work with a notion of convex space rather than a cone.

Given a partial metric space (X, p), we use (BX, ⊑dp) to denote the poset of formal balls of the associated quasi-metric space (X, dp). We obtain characterisations of complete partial metric spaces and sup-separable complete partial metric spaces in terms of domain-theoretic properties of (BX, ⊑dp). In particular, we prove that a partial metric space (X, p) is complete if and only if the poset (BX, ⊑dp) is a domain. Furthermore, for any complete partial metric space (X, p), we construct a Smyth complete quasi-metric q on BX that extends the quasi-metric dp such that both the Scott topology and the partial order ⊑dp are induced by q. This is done using the partial quasi-metric concept recently introduced and discussed by H. P. Künzi, H. Pajoohesh and M. P. Schellekens (Künzi et al. 2006). Our approach, which is inspired by methods due to A. Edalat and R. Heckmann (Edalat and Heckmann 1998), generalises to partial metric spaces the constructions given by R. Heckmann (Heckmann 1999) and J. J. M. M. Rutten (Rutten 1998) for metric spaces.

The investigation into the foundational aspects of linguistic mechanisms for programming long-running transactions (such as the scope operator of WS-BPEL) has recently renewed the interest in process algebraic operators that, due to the occurrence of a failure, interrupt the execution of one process, replacing it with another one called the failure handler. We investigate the decidability of termination problems for two simple fragments of CCS (one with recursion and one with replication) extended with one of two such operators, the interrupt operator of CSP and the try-catch operator for exception handling. More precisely, we consider the existential termination problem (existence of one terminated computation) and the universal termination problem (all computations terminate). We prove that, as far as the decidability of the considered problems is concerned, under replication there is no difference between interrupt and try-catch (universal termination is decidable while existential termination is not), while under recursion this is not the case (existential termination is undecidable while universal termination is decidable only for interrupt). As a consequence of our undecidability results, we show the existence of an expressiveness gap between a fragment of CCS and its extension with either the interrupt or the try-catch operator.

We investigate, in a process algebraic setting, a new notion of correctness for service compositions, which we call strong service compliance: composed services are strong compliant if their composition is both deadlock and livelock free (this is the traditional notion of compliance), and whenever a message can be sent to invoke a service, it is guranteed to be ready to serve the invocation. We also define a new notion of refinement, called strong subcontract pre-order, suitable for strong compliance: given a composition of strong compliant services, we can replace any service with any other service in subcontract relation while preserving the overall strong compliance. Finally, we present a characterisation of the strong subcontract pre-order by resorting to the theory of a (should) testing pre-order.