We present a calculus of mobile processes without prefix or summation, called the solos calculus. Using two different encodings, we show that the solos calculus can express both action prefix and guarded summation. One encoding gives a strong correspondence, but uses a match operator; the other yields a slightly weaker correspondence, but uses no additional operators. We also show that the expressive power of the solos calculus is still retained by the sub-calculus where actions carry at most two names. On the other hand, expressiveness is lost in the solos calculus without match and with actions carrying at most one name.

The Asynchronous $\pi$-calculus, proposed in Honda and Tokoro (1991) and, independently, in Boudol (1992), is a subset of the $\pi$-calculus (Milner et al. 1992), which contains no explicit operators for choice and output prefixing. The communication mechanism of this calculus, however, is powerful enough to simulate output prefixing, as shown in Honda and Tokoro (1991) and Boudol (1992), and input-guarded choice, as shown in Nestmann and Pierce (2000). A natural question arises, then, as to whether or not it is as expressive as the full $\pi$-calculus. We show that this is not the case. More precisely, we show that there does not exist any uniform, fully distributed translation from the $\pi$-calculus into the asynchronous $\pi$-calculus, up to any ‘reasonable’ notion of equivalence. This result is based on the incapability of the asynchronous $\pi$-calculus to break certain symmetries that may be present in the initial communication graph. By similar arguments, we prove a separation result between the $\pi$-calculus and CCS, and between the $\pi$-calculus and the $\pi$-calculus with internal mobility, a subset of the $\pi$-calculus proposed by Sangiorgi where the output actions can only transmit private names.

We consider the Pure Safe Ambient Calculus, which is Levi and Sangiorgi's Safe Ambient Calculus (a variant of Cardelli and Gordon's Mobile Ambient Calculus) restricted to its mobility primitives – in particular, we focus on its expressive power. Since it has no form of communication or substitution, we show how these notions can be simulated by mobility and modifications in the hierarchical structure of ambients. As a main result, we use these techniques to design an encoding of the synchronous $\pi$-calculus into pure ambients, and we study its correctness, thus showing that pure ambients are as expressive as the $\pi$-calculus. In order to simplify the proof and give an intuitive understanding of the encoding, we design an intermediate language, the $\pi$-Calculus with Explicit Substitutions and Channels, which is an extension of the $\pi$-calculus in which communication and substitution are broken into simpler steps, and we show that is has the same expressive power as the $\pi$-calculus.

Concrete computing machines, either sequential or concurrent, rely on an intimate relationship between computation and time. We recall the general characteristic properties of physical time and of present realisations of computing systems. We emphasise the role of computing interferences, that is, the necessity of avoiding them in order to give a causal implementation to logical operations. We compare synchronous and asynchronous systems, and give a brief survey of some methods used to deal with computing interferences. Using a graphic representation, we show that synchronous and asynchronous circuits reflect the same opposition as the Newtonian and relativistic causal structures for physical space-time.