We give a short and elementary proof of the Schröder–Simpson Theorem, which states that the space of all continuous maps from a given space X to the non-negative reals with their Scott topology is the cone-theoretic dual of the probabilistic powerdomain on X.

Continuous lattices were characterised by Martín Escardó as precisely those objects that are Kan-injective with respect to a certain class of morphisms. In this paper we study Kan-injectivity in general categories enriched in posets. As an example, ω-CPO's are precisely the posets that are Kan-injective with respect to the embeddings ω ↪ ω + 1 and 0 ↪ 1.

For every class $\mathcal{H}$ of morphisms, we study the subcategory of all objects that are Kan-injective with respect to $\mathcal{H}$ and all morphisms preserving Kan extensions. For categories such as Top0 and Pos, we prove that whenever $\mathcal{H}$ is a set of morphisms, the above subcategory is monadic, and the monad it creates is a Kock–Zöberlein monad. However, this does not generalise to proper classes, and we present a class of continuous mappings in Top0 for which Kan-injectivity does not yield a monadic category.

In this paper we introduce stable systems of inclusions, which feature chosen arrows A ↪ B to capture the notion that A is a subobject of B, and proposes them as an alternative context to stable systems of monics to discuss partiality. A category C equipped with such a system $\mathscr{I}$, called an i-category, is shown to give rise to an associated category ∂(C,$\mathscr{I}$) of partial maps, which is a split restriction category whose restriction monics are inclusions. This association is the object part of a 2-equivalence between such inclusively split restriction categories and i-categories. $\mathscr{I}$ determines a stable system of monics $\mathscr{I}$+ on C, and, conversely, a stable system of monics $\mathscr{M}$ on C yields an i-category (C[$\mathscr{M}$],$\mathscr{M}$+), giving a 2-adjunction between i-categories and m-categories. The category of partial maps Par(C,$\mathscr{M}$) is isomorphic to the full subcategory of ∂(C[$\mathscr{M}$],$\mathscr{M}$+) comprising the objects of C, and ∂(C,$\mathscr{I}$) ≅ Par(C,$\mathscr{I}$+).

In this paper, we prove some embedding theorems for LTL (linear-time temporal logic) and its variants: viz. some generalisations, extensions and fragments of LTL. Using these embedding theorems, we give uniform proofs of the completeness, cut-elimination and/or decidability theorems for LTL and its variants. The proposed embedding theorems clarify the relationships between some LTL-variations (for example, LTL, a dynamic topological logic, a fixpoint logic, a spatial logic, Prior's logic, Davies' logic and an NP-complete LTL) and some traditional logics (for example, classical logic, intuitionistic logic and infinitary logic).

Retrenchment is a flexible model evolution formalism that compensates for the limitations imposed by specific formulations of refinement. Its refinement-like proof obligations feature additional predicates for accommodating design data describing the model change. The best results are obtained when refinement and retrenchment cooperate, the paradigmatic scheme for this being the commuting square or tower, in which ‘horizontal retrenchment rungs’ commute with ‘vertical refinement columns’ to navigate through a much more extensive design space than permitted by refinement alone. In practice, the navigation is accomplished through ‘square completion’ constructions, and we present and prove a full suite of square completion theorems.