Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:35:09.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wave reflexion near a wall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

A. Robinson
Affiliation:
College of AeronauticsCranfield

Abstract

The field of flow due to a shock wave or expansion wave undergoes a considerable modification in the neighbourhood of a rigid wall. It has been suggested that the resulting propagation of the disturbance upstream is largely due to the fact that the main flow in the boundary layer is subsonic. Simple models were produced by Howarth, and Tsien and Finston, to test this suggestion, assuming the co-existence of layers of uniform supersonic and subsonic main-stream velocities. The analysis developed in the present paper is designed to cope with any arbitrary continuous velocity profile which varies from zero at the wall to a constant supersonic velocity in the main stream. Numerical examples are calculated, and it is concluded that a simple inviscid theory is incapable of giving an adequate theoretical account of the phenomenon. The analysis includes a detailed discussion of the process of continuous wave reflexion in a supersonic shear layer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Liepmann, H. W., Roshko, A. and Dhawan, S. On the reflection of shock waves from boundary layers. Galcit Report, August 1949 (Contract NAw-5631).Google Scholar
(2)Howarth, L.The propagation of steady disturbances in a supersonic stream bounded on one side by a parallel subsonic stream. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 4 (1948), 380–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Tsien, H. S. and Finston, M.Interaction between parallel streams of supersonic velocities. J. Aero. Sci. 16 (1949), 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Transonic Research Group. Problems in shock reflection. Galcit Report, 1949 (Contract W 33–038 ac–1717, 11592).Google Scholar
(5)Lees, L. Interaction between the laminar boundary layer over a plane surface and an incident oblique shock wave. Aero. Engng Lab. Rep., Princeton University, no. 143 (01 1949).Google Scholar
(6)Picard, E.Traité d'analyse, 2 (1904), 340–51.Google Scholar
(7)Ince, E. L.Ordinary differential equations (U.S. edition, 1944), pp. 6375.Google Scholar