Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:56:44.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tauberian theory for the asymptotic forms of statistical frequency functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

J. M. Hammersley
J. M. Hammersley
Affiliation:
Lectureship in the Design and Analysis of Scientific ExperimentUniversity of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An Abelian theorem is a theorem stating that a given behaviour on the part of each of several quantities entails similar behaviour for their average. A Tauberian theorem is a converse to an Abelian theorem. As a rule, a given behaviour of an average will not entail similar behaviour of the individual quantities themselves unless there is some condition imposed to secure reasonably uniform behaviour amongst the individuals. Such a condition, known as a Tauberian condition, is usually sufficient but not necessary, and it enters into the premises of the Tauberian theorem. We interpret ‘average’ in a wide sense to include any kind of smoothing process; for example, the integral of a function f(t) is an average of the values of f(t) corresponding to individual values of t; and we may seek a sufficient Tauberian condition such that a limit-behaviour of an integral-average

entails the corresponding limit-behaviour

for individual values of t.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , October 1952 , pp. 592 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Blumberg, H.On convex functions. Trans. Amer. math. Soc. 20 (1919), 40–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Cramér, H.Mathematical methods of statistics (Princeton, 1946).Google Scholar
(3)Dantzig, G. B.On a class of distributions that approach the normal distribution function. Ann. math. Statist. 10 (1939), 247–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Haden, H. G.A note on the distribution of the different orderings of n objects. Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 43 (1947), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Hammersley, J. M.On estimating restricted parameters. J. R. statist. Soc. B, 12 (1950), 192–240.Google Scholar
(6)Hammersley, J. M.The distribution of distance in a hypersphere. Ann. math. Statist. 21 (1950), 447–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Hammersley, J. M.The sums of products of the natural numbers. Proc. Lond. math. Soc. (3), 1 (1951), 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Kendall, M. G.Advanced theory of statistics, vol. 1 (London, 1943).Google Scholar
(9)Kendall, M. G.Rank correlation methods (London, 1948).Google Scholar
(10)Moran, P. A. P.Rank correlation and permutation distributions. Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 44 (1948), 142–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar