Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:34:24.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sums of random multiplicative functions over function fields with few irreducible factors

Part of: Probabilistic theory: distribution modulo $1$; metric theory of algorithms Limit theorems Stochastic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

DAKSH AGGARWAL ,
UNIQUE SUBEDI ,
WILLIAM VERREAULT ,
ASIF ZAMAN  and
CHENGHUI ZHENG
DAKSH AGGARWAL
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Grinnell College, 1115 8th Ave # 3011, Grinnell, IA, USA, 50112 e-mail: [email protected]
UNIQUE SUBEDI
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, 1085 University Ave, 323 West Hall, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 48109 e-mail: [email protected]
WILLIAM VERREAULT
Affiliation:
Département de Mathématiques et de Statistique, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada e-mail: [email protected]
ASIF ZAMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, 40 St. George Street, Room 6290, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 2E4 e-mail: [email protected]
CHENGHUI ZHENG
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Toronto, 100 St.George Street, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 3G3 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We establish a normal approximation for the limiting distribution of partial sums of random Rademacher multiplicative functions over function fields, provided the number of irreducible factors of the polynomials is small enough. This parallels work of Harper for random Rademacher multiplicative functions over the integers.

MSC classification

Primary: 11K65: Arithmetic functions
Secondary: 60F05: Central limit and other weak theorems 60G50: Sums of independent random variables; random walks
Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 173 , Issue 3 , November 2022 , pp. 715 - 726
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afshar, A. and Porritt, S.. The function field Sathe–Selberg formula in arithmetic progressions and ‘short intervals’. Acta Arih. 187 (2019), 101–124.Google Scholar
Gómez-Colunga, A., Kavaler, C., McNew, N. and Zhu, M.. On the size of primitive sets in function fields. Finite Fields Appl. 64 (2020), 101658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granville, A., Harper, A. J. and Soundararajan, K.. Mean values of multiplicative functions over function fields. Research in Number Theory, 1 (2015), 25.Google Scholar
Harper, A. J.. On the limit distributions of some sums of a random multiplicative function. J. Reine Angew. Math. 678 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, B.. Summation of a random multiplicative function on numbers having few prime factors. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 150(2) (2011), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeish, D. L.. Dependent central limit theorems and invariance principles. Ann. Probab., 2(4) (1974), 620–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramanujan, S. and Hardy, G.. The normal number of prime factors of a number n . Quarterly J. Math. 48 (1917), 76–92.Google Scholar
Sathe, L. G.. On a problem of Hardy on the distribution of integers having a given number of prime factors, I, II. J. Indian Math. Soc.(NS) 17 (1953), 63–141.Google Scholar
Sathe, L. G.. On a problem of Hardy on the distribution of integers having a given number of prime factors, III, IV. J. Indian Math. Soc.(NS) 18 (1954), 27–81.Google Scholar
Selberg, A.. Note on a paper by L. G. Sathe. J. Indian Math. Soc., 1 (1954), 83–87.Google Scholar
Warlimont, R.. Arithmetical semigroups. IV. Selberg’s analysis. Arch. Math. (Basel) 60(1) (1993), 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wintner, A.. Random factorisations and Riemann’s hypothesis. Duke Math. J., 11(2) (1944), 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar