Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:29:50.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of the ‘irreversibility paradox’ for a simple statistical assembly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

H. N. V. Temperley
H. N. V. Temperley
Affiliation:
Atomic Weapons Research EstablishmentAldermastonBerkshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A very simple model, consisting of N particles moving in a one-dimensional assembly divided by potential ‘humps’ into M cells, is studied. The process of passing from a quantum-mechanical description of such an assembly to the equation of diffusion type that governs it in practice is shown to consist of at least three separate steps: ‘averaging over phases’, and letting N and M become large. The effects of these steps are considered separately. Strict irreversibility in time appears after the first step, but the assembly remains ergodic until after the second step and fluctuations persist until after the third step.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , October 1956 , pp. 712 - 718
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Feynman, R. P.Second Berkeley Symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (Berkeley, 1951).Google Scholar
(2)Katsura, S.Progr. Theor. Phys., Osaka, 13 (1955), 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Pauli, W.Festschrift zum 60 Geburtstage A. Sommerfelds (Leipzig, 1928), p. 30.Google Scholar
(4)Price, P. J.Phil. Mag. (7), 41 (1950), 948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Temperley, H. N. V.Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond., A, 67 (1954), 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Van Hove, L.Physica,'s Grav. 21 (1955), 517.Google Scholar