Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:38:38.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strong convergence of Kleinian groups and Carathéodory convergence of domains of discontinuity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Ken'ichi Ohshika
Affiliation:
IHES, 91440 Bures-sur-Yvette, France, and Department of Mathematics, TokyoInstitute of Technology, Oh-okayama, Tokyo 152, Japan

Extract

In the theory of Kleinian groups, important examples of Kleinian groups are frequently constructed as algebraic limits of known sequences of Kleinian groups, for example quasi-conformal deformations of a Kleinian group. It is an important problem to determine the properties of the limit Kleinian group from information on the sequence converging to the limit. The topological properties of the domain of discontinuity and the limit set of a Kleinian group provide valuable pieces of information about the Kleinian group. It is reasonable to expect that in a good situation, the domain of discontinuity of the limit Kleinian group is the Carathéodory limit of the domains of discontinuity of the sequence, or, equivalently, the limit set of the limit Kleinian group is the Hausdorif limit of the limit sets of the sequence. Our main theorem (Theorem 5) shows that this is true when the sequence strongly converges to the limit, and the Kleinian groups of the sequence and the limit preserve the parabolicity in both directions and satisfy the condition (*) introduced by Bonahon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Ahlfors, L.. Finitely generated Kleinian groups. Amer. J. Math. 86 (1964), 413423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bonahon, F.. Bouts de variétés hyperboliques de dimension 3. Ann. of Math. (2) 124 (1986), 71158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Canary, R. D., Epstein, D. B. A. and Green, P.. Notes on notes of Thurston. In Analytical and Geometric Aspects of Hyperbolic Spaces, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series no. 111 (Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 392.Google Scholar
[4]Epstein, D. B. A. and Marden, A.. Convex hulls in hyperbolic space, a theorem of Sullivan, and measured pleated surfaces. In Analytical and Geometric Aspects of Hyperbolic Spaces, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series no. 111 (Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 113253.Google Scholar
[5]Jørgensen, T. and Marden, A.. Algebraic and geometric convergence of Kleinian groups. Math. Scand. 66 (1990), 4772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kerckhoff, S. and Thurston, W.. Non-continuity of the action of the modular group at Bers' boundary of Teichmüller space. Invent. Math. 100 (1990), 2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]McCullough, D.. Compact submanifolds of 3-manifolds with boundary. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 37 (1986), 299307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Morgan, J.. On Thurston's uniformization theorem for three-dimensional manifolds. In The Smith Conjecture (Academic Press, 1984), pp. 36.Google Scholar
[9]Ohshika, K.. Geometric behaviour of Kleinian groups on boundaries of deformation spaces. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 43 (1992), 97111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Scott, C. P.. Compact submanifolds of 3-manifolds. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 7 (1973), 246250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Thurston, W.. The geometry and topology of 3-manifolds. Lecture notes, Princeton University (1979).Google Scholar
[12]Thurston, W.. Hyperbolic structures on 3-manifolds I: Deformation of acylindrical manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) 124 (1986), 203246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar