Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:43:36.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The straggling of electrons due to radiation and ionization loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

H. C. Corben
H. C. Corben
Affiliation:
Trinity College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The probability of an electron having an energy greater than a certain fraction of its initial energy after traversing a certain thickness of matter is calculated for different values of the initial energy. Whereas in previous calculations the energy losses by radiation and by ionization have been treated separately, and the results added, the two types of losses are here combined and their effect on each other included. The results may be compared with those of experiment for values of the initial energy up to a few times the initial energy up to a few times the critical energy of the substance traversed. The theoretical values obtained are found to give better agreement with the results of experiment than do those obtained by the less accurate method.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , October 1938 , pp. 540 - 549
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bethe, and Heitler, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 146 (1934), 83–112.Google Scholar
(2)Bhabha, and Heitler, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 159 (1937), 432–58, equations (2), (4), (5), (5″).Google Scholar
(3)Møller, , Ann. Physik, (5), 14 (1932), 531–85. Bethe, Zeit. f. Physik, 76 (1932), 293–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, , Ann. Physik, (5), 16 (1933), 285–320; Zeit. f. Physik, 81 (1933), 363–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Landau, and Rumer, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 166 (1938), 213–38.Google Scholar
(5)Blackett, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 165 (1938), 11–31.Google Scholar