Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:47:05.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some combinatorial results involving Young diagrams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

G. D. James
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Cambridge University

Extract

In the first half of this paper we introduce a new method of examining the q-hook structure of a Young diagram, and use it to prove most of the standard results about q-cores and q-quotients. In particular, we give a quick new proof of Chung's Conjecture (2), which determines the number of diagrams with a given q-weight and says how many of them are q-regular. In the case where q is prime, this tells us how many ordinary and q-modular irreducible representations of the symmetric group there are in a given q-block. None of the results of section 2 is original. In the next section we give a new definition, the p-power diagram, which is closely connected with the p-quotient. This concept is interesting because when p is prime a condition involving the p-power diagram appears to be a necessary and sufficient criterion for the diagram to be p-regular and the corresponding ordinary irreducible representation of to remain irreducible modulo p. In this paper we derive combinatorial results involving the p-power diagram, and in a later article we investigate the relevant representation theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Brauer, R. On a conjecture by Nakayama. Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada III 41 (1947), 1119.Google Scholar
(2) Chung, J. H. On the modular representations of the symmetric groups. Canad. J. Math. 3 (1951), 309327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Farahat, H. K. On p-quotients and star diagrams of the symmetric group. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 49 (1953), 157160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Frame, J. S. and Robinson, G. de B. On a theorem of Osima and Nagao. Canad. J. Math. 6 (1954), 125127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) James, G. D. The irreducible representations of the symmetric groups. Bull. London Math. Soc. 8 (1976), 4244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6) Littlewood, D. E. Modular representations of symmetric groups. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 209 (1951), 333352.Google Scholar
(7) Meier, N. and Tappe, J. Ein neuer Beweis der Nakayama-Vermutung über die Block struktur Symmetrischer Gruppen. Bull. London Math. Soc. 8 (1976), 3437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8) Nagao, H. Note on the modular representations of the symmetric groups. Caned. J. Math. 5 (1953), 356363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9) Osima, M. Note on a paper by J. S. Frame and G. de B. Robinson. Okayama Math. J. 6 (1956), 7779.Google Scholar
(10) Robinson, G. De B. On a conjecture by Nakayama. Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada III 41 (1947), 2025.Google Scholar
(11) Robinson, G. De B. On a conjecture by J. H. Chung. Caned. J. Math. 4 (1952), 373380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12) Robinson, G. De B. Representation theory of the symmetric group (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1961).Google Scholar