Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:24:01.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Seifert-matrix interpretation of Cappell and Shaneson's approach to link cobordisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Ki Hyoung Ko
Ki Hyoung Ko
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Korea Institute of Technology, Taejon., 305-701, Korea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We classified the set of Fm-cobordism classes of Fm-links by their Seifert matrices in [5]. On the other hand Cappell and Shaneson identified them with essentially a quotient group of their homology surgery obstruction group [2]. In this paper, we will find a description of their surgery obstruction in terms of a Seifert matrix. In relation to Ledimet's recent results [7], we hope this might provide some clue to whether Fm-cobordism or boundary cobordism is stronger than ordinary link cobordism. It also seems to be an interesting algebraic question to find an algorithm for obtaining a Seifert matrix from their surgery obstruction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 106 , Issue 3 , November 1989 , pp. 531 - 545
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Cappell, S. and Shaneson, J.. The codimension two placement problem and homology equivalent manifold. Ann. of Math. (2) 99 (1974), 277–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Cappell, S. and Shaneson, J.. Link cobordism. Comment. Math. Helv. 55 (1980), 20–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Gutierrez, M.. Boundary links and an unlinking theorem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 171 (1972), 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Kearton, C.. Cobordism of knots and Blanchfield duality. J. London Math. Soc. 10 (1975). 406–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Ko, K. H.. Seifert matrices and boundary link cobordisms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 299 (1987). 657–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Ko, K. H.. Algebraic classifications of simple links of odd dimension ≥ 3. (Submitted for publication.)Google Scholar
[7]Ledimet, J.. Cobordism d'enplacements de disques. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Nantes (1987).Google Scholar
[8]Levine, J.. Knot cobordism groups in codimension two. Comment. Math. Helv. 44 (1969). 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Levine, J.. Knot modules. I. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 229 (1977), 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Matsumoto, Y.. On the equivalence of algebraic formulations of knot cobordism. Japan. J. Math. (N.S.) 3 (1977), 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Ranicki, A. A.. Exact Sequences in the Algebraic Theory of Surgery (Princeton University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
[12]Wall, C. T. C.. Surgery on Compact Manifolds (Academic Press, 1970).Google Scholar