Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:42:26.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Property (BB) and holomorphic functions on Fréchet-Montel spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Andreas Defant  and
Manuel Maestre
Andreas Defant
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Mathematik, Carl von Ossieztky Universität, Ammerländer Heerstraβe 114–118, D-2900 Oldenburg, Germany
Manuel Maestre
Affiliation:
Departamento de Análisis Matemático, Universidad de Valencia, Doctor Moliner 50, 46100 Burjasot (Valencia), Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two of the most important topologies on the space ℋ(E) of all holomorphic functions f:E → ℂ on a complex locally convex space E are the compact-open topology τ0 and the Nachbin-ported topology τε. We recall that a seminorm p on ℋ(E) is said to be τω-continuous if there is a compact K such that for every open set V with K contained in V there is a constant c > 0 satisfying

Clearly, the following natural question arises: when do the topologies τ0 and τω coincide? In the setting of Fréchet spaces equality of τ0 and τω forces E to be a Montel space; Mujica [21] proved τ0 = τω for Fréchet-Schwartz spaces and Ansemil-Ponte [1] showed that for Fréchet-Montel spaces this happens if and only if the space of all continuous n-homogeneous polynomials with the compact-open topology, (Pn(E), τ0), is barrelled. By duality, it turns out that the question τ0 = τω is intimately related to ‘Grothendieck's problème des topologies’ which asks whether or not for two Fréchet spaces E1 and E2 each bounded set B of the (completed) projective tensor product is contained in the closed absolutely convex hull of the set B1 ⊗ B2, where Bk is a bounded subset of Ek for k = 1, 2. If this is the case, then the pair (E1, E2) is said to have property (BB). Observe that every compact set B in can always be lifted by compact subsets Bk of Ek (see e.g. [20], 15·6·3). Hence, for Fréchet-Montel spaces E1 and E2, property (BB) of (El,E2) means that is Fréchet-Montel and vice versa. Taskinen[24] found the first counterexample to Grothendieck's problem. In [25] he constructed a Fréchet-Montel space E0 for which (E0,E0) does not have property (BB), and Ansemil-Taskinen [2] showed that τ0 ≠ τω on ℋ(E0).

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 115 , Issue 2 , March 1994 , pp. 305 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Ansemil, M. and Ponte, S.. The compact-open and the Nachbin ported topologies on spaces of holomorphie functions. Arch. Math. 51 (1988), 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Ansemil, J. M. and Taskinen, J.. On a problem of topologies in infinite dimensional holomorphy. Arch. Math. 54 (1990), 61–64.Google Scholar
[3]Bonet, J., Díaz, J. C. and Taskinen, J.. Tensor stable Fréchet and (DF)-spaces. Collec. Math. 42, 3 (1991), 199–236.Google Scholar
[4]Bonet, J., Defant, A. and Galbis, A.. Tensor products of a Fréchet or (DF)-space with a Banach space. J. of Math. Anal. Appl. 166 (1992), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Bonet, J. and Peris, A.. On the injective tensor product of quasinormable spaces. Results in Math. 20 (1991), 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Defant, A. and Floret, K.. Tensor Norms and Operator Ideals, North-Holland Math. Studies, 176 (North-Holland, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Defant, A. and Floret, K.. Topological tensor products and the approximation property of locally convex spaces. Bull Soc. R. Sci. Liège 58 (1) (1989), 29–51.Google Scholar
[8]Defant, A. and Floret, K.. Tensornorm techniques for the (DF)-space problem. Note di Matematica 10 (1990), 217–222.Google Scholar
[9]Defant, A., Floret, K. and Taskinen, J.. On the injective tensor product of (DF)-spaces. Arch. Math. 57 (1991), 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Defant, A. and Govaerts, W.. Tensor products and spaces of vector-valued continuous functions. Manuscripta Math. 55 (1986), 433–449.Google Scholar
[11]Dáaz, J. C. and López Molina, J. A.. Projective tensor products of Fréchet spaces. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 34 (1991), 169–178.Google Scholar
[12]Díaz, J. C. and Miñarro, M. A.. On Fréchet–Montel spaces and projective tensor products. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 113 (1993), 335–341.Google Scholar
[13]Dineen, S.. Holomorphic functions on Fréchet–Montel spaces. J. of Math. Anal. Appl. 163, (2) (1992), 581–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Dineen, S.. Holomorphie functions and the (BB)-property. Preprint 1991.Google Scholar
[15]Galindo, P., García, D. and Maestre, M.. The coincidence of τ0 and τΩ for spaces of holomorphie functions on some Fréchet–Montel spaces. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 91A (2) (1991), 137–143.Google Scholar
[16]Hollstein, R.. Tensor sequences and inductive limits with local partition of the unity. Manuscripta Math. 52 (1985), 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Hollstein, R.. Locally convex α-tensor products and α-spaces. Math. Nachr. 120 (1985), 73–90.Google Scholar
[18]Hollstein, R.. Inductive limits and ε-tensor products. J. Reine Angew. Math. 319 (1980), 273–297.Google Scholar
[19]Hollstein, R.. Extension and lifting of continuous linear mappings in locally convex spaces. Math. Nachr. 108 (1982), 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Jakchow, H.. Locally Convex Spaces (B. G. Teubner, 1981).Google Scholar
[21]Mujica, J.. A Banach–Dieudonné theorem for germs of holomorphic functions. J. Func. Anal. 57 (1984), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Peris, A.. Productos Tensoriales de Espacios Localmente Convexos Casinormables y otras Clases Relacionadas. Doctoral Thesis. Universidad de Valencia, 1992.Google Scholar
[23]Pietsch, A.. Nuclear Locally Convex Spaces (Springer, 1972).Google Scholar
[24]Taskinen, J.. Counterexamples to ‘Problème des topologies’ of Grothendieck. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Serie A, Math. 63 (1986).Google Scholar
[25]Taskinen, J.. The projective tensor product of Fréchet–Montel spaces. Studia Math. 91 (1988), 17–30.Google Scholar
[26]Taskinen, J.. (FBa) and (FBB)-spaces. Math. Z. 198 (1988), 339–365.Google Scholar