Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:31:35.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Properties of some superconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

D. Shoenberg
D. Shoenberg
Affiliation:
The Royal Society Mond LaboratoryCambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The critical-field curves of pure aluminium, gallium, thorium and zinc were measured by a magnetic induction method. An unusually marked supercooling effect was found in aluminium and to a much smaller extent also in gallium; some experiments on this effect are discussed. The first three of these metals were found to have “ideally pure” superconducting properties, and thorium, although belonging to the “hard” group of superconductors, had a value of dHc/dT of only 190 gauss/degree K. Only a very minute fraction of the volume of a titanium specimen was found to become superconducting at temperatures down to 1° K., although Meissner had found a titanium wire to have zero resistance below 1·8° K.; an explanation of this discrepancy is put forward. Molybdenum and uranium did not become superconducting down to 0·3 and 0·98° K. respectively, though, in the case of one uranium sample, a small fraction of the volume showed superconducting effects as in titanium.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 1940 , pp. 84 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Shoenberg, (to be published shortly).Google Scholar
(2)Keesom, . Commun. Phys. Lab. Univ. Leiden, Supp. 71d (1932).Google Scholar
(3)Schmidt, and Keesom, . Physica, 4 (1937), 971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Blaisse, , Cooke, and Hull, . Physica, 6 (1939), 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Mendelssohn, and Pontius, . Physica, 3 (1936), 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Shoenberg, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 33 (1937), 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)London, H.Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 152 (1935), 650.Google Scholar
(8)Keesom, . Commun. Phys. Lab. Univ. Leiden, 224 c (1933).Google Scholar
(9)Kok, and Keesom, . Physica, 4 (1937), 835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)de Haas, and Voogd, . Commun. Phys. Lab. Univ. Leiden, 199d (1929).Google Scholar
(11)Shoenberg, . Nature, 142 (1938), 874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Mendelssohn, and Moore, . Phil. Mag. 21 (1936), 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Meissner, . Z. Phys. 60 (1930), 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Shoenberg, . Superconductivity, p. 8. (Cambridge, 1938.)Google Scholar
(15)Kürti, and Simon, . Physica, 1 (1934), 1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Keesom, . Physica, 1 (1934), 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Meissner, . Z. Phys. 60 (1930), 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Meissner, , Franz, and Westerhoff, . Ann. Phys., Lpz., 13 (1932), 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19)Meissner, , Franz, and Westerhoff, . Z. Phys. 75 (1932), 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar