Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:47:19.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presentations for (singular) partition monoids: a new approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2017

JAMES EAST
JAMES EAST*
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Mathematics; School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We give new, short proofs of the presentations for the partition monoid and its singular ideal originally given in the author's 2011 papers in Journal of Algebra and International Journal of Algebra and Computation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 165 , Issue 3 , November 2018 , pp. 549 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Auinger, K., Chen, Y., Hu, X., Luo, Y. and Volkov, M. V. The finite basis problem for Kauffman monoids. Algebra Universalis, 74 (3-4) (2015), 333–350.Google Scholar
[2] Auinger, K. Pseudovarieties generated by Brauer type monoids. Forum Math. 26 (1) (2014), 1–24.Google Scholar
[3] Auinger, K., Dolinka, I. and Volkov, M. V. Equational theories of semigroups with involution. J. Algebra 369 (2012), 203–225.Google Scholar
[4] Dolinka, I., East, J. and Gray, R. D. Motzkin monoids and partial Brauer monoids. J. Algebra 471 (2017), 251–298.Google Scholar
[5] East, J. A presentation of the singular part of the symmetric inverse monoid. Comm. Algebra 34 (5) (2006), 1671–1689.Google Scholar
[6] East, J. A presentation for the singular part of the full transformation semigroup. Semigroup Forum 81 (2) (2010), 357–379.Google Scholar
[7] East, J. Generators and relations for partition monoids and algebras. J. Algebra 339 (2011), 1–26.Google Scholar
[8] East, J. On the singular part of the partition monoid. Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 21 (1-2) (2011), 147–178.Google Scholar
[9] East, J. A symmetrical presentation for the singular part of the symmetric inverse monoid. Algebra Universalis 74 (3-4) (2015), 207–228.Google Scholar
[10] East, J. and FitzGerald, D. G. The semigroup generated by the idempotents of a partition monoid. J. Algebra 372 (2012), 108–133.Google Scholar
[11] East, J. and Gray, R. D. Diagram monoids and Graham–Houghton graphs: idempotents and generating sets of ideals. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 146 (2017), 63–128.Google Scholar
[12] FitzGerald, D. G. A presentation for the monoid of uniform block permutations. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 68 (2) (2003), 317–324.Google Scholar
[13] FitzGerald, D. G. and Lau, K. W. On the partition monoid and some related semigroups. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 83 (2) (2011), 273–288.Google Scholar
[14] FitzGerald, D. G. and Leech, J. Dual symmetric inverse monoids and representation theory. J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 64 (3) (1998), 345–367.Google Scholar
[15] Halverson, T. and Ram, A. Partition algebras. European J. Combin. 26 (6) (2005), 869–921.Google Scholar
[16] Howie, J. M. The subsemigroup generated by the idempotents of a full transformation semigroup. J. London Math. Soc. 41 (1966), 707–716.Google Scholar
[17] Jones, V. F. R. The Potts model and the symmetric group. In Subfactors (Kyuzeso, 1993), (World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 1994), pages 259–267.Google Scholar
[18] Koenig, S. A panorama of diagram algebras. In Trends in representation theory of algebras and related topics EMS Ser. Congr. Rep. Eur. Math. Soc. (Zürich, 2008), pages 491–540.Google Scholar
[19] Lau, K. W. and FitzGerald, D. G. Ideal structure of the Kauffman and related monoids. Comm. Algebra 34 (7) (2006), 2617–2629.Google Scholar
[20] Lipscomb, S. Symmetric inverse semigroups. Math. Surv. Monog., vol. 46. (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996).Google Scholar
[21] Maltcev, V. and Mazorchuk, V. Presentation of the singular part of the Brauer monoid. Math. Bohem. 132 (3) (2007), 297–323.Google Scholar
[22] Martin, P. Temperley–Lieb algebras for nonplanar statistical mechanics–-the partition algebra construction. J. Knot Theory Ramifications 3 (1) (1994), 51–82.Google Scholar
[23] Martin, P. On diagram categories, representation theory and statistical mechanics. In Noncommutative rings, group rings, diagram algebras and their applications. Contemp. Math. vol. 456 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2008), pages 99–136.Google Scholar
[24] Moore, E. H. Concerning the abstract groups of order k! and k!/2 holohedrically isomorphic with the symmetric and the alternating substitution-groups on k letters. Proc. London Math. Soc. 28 (1) (1897), 357–366.Google Scholar
[25] Popova, L. M. Defining relations in some semigroups of partial transformations of a finite set (in Russian). Uchenye Zap. Leningrad Gos. Ped. Inst. 218 (1961), 191–212.Google Scholar
[26] Wilcox, S. Cellularity of diagram algebras as twisted semigroup algebras. J. Algebra 309 (1) (2007), 10–31.Google Scholar