Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:09:36.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parametrized units in algebraic number fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Loren D. Olson
Loren D. Olson
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Tromsø, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the fundamental problems in algebraic number theory is the construction of units in algebraic number fields. Various authors have considered number fields which are parametrized by an integer variable. They have described units in these fields by polynomial expressions in the variable e.g. the fields ℚ(√[N2 + 1]), Nεℤ, with the units εN = N + √[N2 + l]. We begin this article by formulating a general principle for obtaining units in algebraic function fields and candidates for units in parametrized families of algebraic number fields. We show that many of the cases considered previously in the literature by such authors as Bernstein [2], Neubrand [8], and Stender [ll] fall in under this principle. Often the results may be obtained much more easily than before. We then examine the connection between parametrized cubic fields and elliptic curves. In §4 we consider parametrized quadratic fields, a situation previously studied by Neubrand [8]. We conclude in §5 by examining the effect of parametrizing the torsion structure on an elliptic curve at the same time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 15 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Adams, W. W. and Razar, M. J.. Multiples of points on elliptic curves and continued fractions. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 41 (1980), 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bernstein, L.. On units and fundamental units. J. reine angew. Math. 257 (1972), 129–145.Google Scholar
[3]Borevich, Z. I. and Shafarevich, I. R.. Number Theory (Academic Press, 1966).Google Scholar
[4]Fricke, R.. Die elliptische Funktionen und ihre Anwendungen (B. G. Teubner, 1922).Google Scholar
[5]Godwin, H. J.. A parametrized set of cyclic cubic fields with even class-number. J. Number Theory 22 (1986), 246–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kubert, D. S.. Universal bounds on the torsion of elliptic curves. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 33 (1976), 193–237.Google Scholar
[7]Kubert, D. S. and Lang, S.. Modular Units (Springer-Verlag, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Neubrand, M.. Einheiten in algebraischen Funktionen- und Zahlkörpern. J. reine angew. Math. 303 (1978), 170–204.Google Scholar
[9]Shanks, D.. The simplest cubic fields. Math. Comp. 28 (1974), 1137–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Schinzel, A.. On some problems of the arithmetical theory of continued fractions II. Ada Arithmetica 7 (1962), 287–298.Google Scholar
[11]Stender, H.-J.. Einheiten für eine allgemeine Klasse total reeller algebraischer Zahlkörper. J. reine angew. Math. 257 (1972), 151–178.Google Scholar