Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:43:03.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paramagnetic hysteresis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

H. N. V. Temperley
Affiliation:
King's CollegeCambridge

Extract

Ewing's original theory of hysteresis, though not admissible for metals, seems to apply to paramagnetic salts. The peculiar form of the interaction between dipoles implies that a certain fraction of them may be incapable of following small changes in the external field. The agreement with experiment is satisfactory, considering the rough nature of the theory.

In conclusion, I should like to thank Messrs E. S. Shire and H. M. Barkla for kindly discussing their results with me before publication, and also Prof. R. H. Fowler, Dr J. D. Cockcroft and Mr A. H. Wilson for helpful discussions. Also I should like to thank the Provost and Fellows of King's College for the award of a studentship, during the tenure of which this work was carried out.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Shire, and Barkla, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 35 (1939), 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Kürti, , Lainé, and Simon, . C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 204 (1937), 754.Google Scholar
(3)Sauer, and Temperley, . To be published shortly.Google Scholar
(4)Ewing, . Proc. Roy. Soc. 48 (1890), 342.Google Scholar
(5)Kronig, and Bouwkamp, . Physica, 5 (1938), 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Fröhlich, and Heitler, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 155 (1936), 640.Google Scholar