Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:19:34.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The packing measure of self-affine carpets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Yuval Peres
Affiliation:
Yale University, Department of Mathematics, New Haven, CT 06520

Abstract

We show that the seif-affine sets considered by McMullen [15] and Bedford [2] have infinite packing measure in their packing dimension θ except when all non-empty rows of the initial pattern have the same number of rectangles. More precisely, the packing measure is infinite in the gauge tθ|logt|−1 and zero in the gauge tθ|logt|−1−δ for any δ > 0.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bandt, C.. Self-similar sets 3, constructions with sofic systems. Monat. Math. 108 (1989), 89102.Google Scholar
[2]Bedford, T.. Crinkly curves, Markov partitions and box dimension in self-similar sets. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Warwick (1984).Google Scholar
[3]Bedford, T.. On Weierstrass-like functions and random recurrent sets. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 106 (1989), 325342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bowen, R.. Equilibrium states and the ergodic theory of Anosov diffeomorphisms. Lecture Notes in Math. 470 (Springer-Verlag, 1974).Google Scholar
[5]Boyle, M., Kitchens, B. and Marcus, B.. A note on minimal covers for sofic systems. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 95 (1985), 403411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Deliu, A., Geronomino, J. S., Shonkwiler, R. and Hardin, D.. Dimensions associated with recurrent self-similar sets. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 110 (1991), 327336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Dembo, A. and Zeitouni, O.. Large deviations techniques and applications (Jones and Bartlett, 1993).Google Scholar
[8]Falconer, K. J.. Fractal Geometry – Mathematical foundations and applications (Wiley, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Gatzouras, D. and Lalley, S.. Hausdorff and box dimensions of certain self-affine fractals. Indiana University Math. J. 41 (1992), 533568.Google Scholar
[10]Hoeffding, W.. Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 58 (1963), 1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Hutchinson, J. E.. Fractals and self-similarity. Indiana University Math. J. 30 (1981), 713747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Kamae, T.. A characterization of self-affine functions. Japan J. Appl. Math. 3 (1986), 271280.Google Scholar
[13]Kenyon, R. and Peres, Y.. Hausdorff dimensions of affine-invariant sets. Preprint.Google Scholar
[14]Kono, N.. On self-affine functions. Japan J. Appl. Math. 3 (1986), 259269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]McMullen, C.. The Hausdorff dimension of general Sierpinski carpets. Nagoya Math. J. 96 (1984), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Moran, P. A. P.. Additive functions of intervals and Hausdorff measure. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 42 (1946), 1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Parry, W.. Intrinsic Markov chains. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 112 (1964), 5565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Peres, Y.. The self-affine carpets of McMullen and Bedford have infinite Hausdorff measure. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., to appear.Google Scholar
[19]Raymond, X. Saint and Tricot, C.. Packing regularity of sets in n-space. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 103 (1988), 133145.Google Scholar
[20]Taylor, S. J. and Tricot, C.. Packing measure, and its evaluation for a Brownian path. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 288 (1985), 679699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Tricot, C.. Sur la classification des ensembles boreliens de mesure de Lebesgue nulle. Thèse de doctorat, Genève (1979).Google Scholar
[22]Tricot, C.. Two definitions of fractional dimension. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 91 (1982), 5774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Weiss, B.. Subshifts of finite type and sofic systems. Monat. Math. 77 (1973), 462474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar