Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:20:46.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the polarisation of mercury lines emitted from a discharge tube in a magnetic field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

H. W. B. Skinner
Affiliation:
Trinity College

Extract

1. Polarisation measurements are described on the Hg lines λ 4358, 5461, 5770, 5791 emitted from a low-pressure electron-maintained arc to which a longitudinal field of up to 3000 gauss may be applied.

2. Two types of polarisation effect have been found. The first is typified by the line λ 5461. It is a polarisation of the light with the electric vector perpendicular to the lines of force. Its maximum value is 9% but it decreases to zero (a) with decreasing field strength and (b) with decreasing current in the tube. It is suggested that this effect is due to a self-reversal of λ 5461 owing to the metastability of the 2 3p2 state and that the polarisation may be caused through a slight non-uniformity of the magnetic field.

The second type of effect is found for λ5770 and 5791. The polarisation is in a plane parallel to the discharge, and is found in a zero magnetic field. This effect is further discussed elsewhere. The line λ 4358 is unpolarised under all conditions tried.

3. Neither of these effects implies a polarisation of the total light emitted directly from atoms in the Transverse Zeeman Effect when the atoms are excited under isotropic conditions and the experiments give definite evidence against the existence of such a polarisation effect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Exhibition of 1851, Senior Student.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, , Zs. f. Phys. vol. XXXI.Google Scholar

Naturwiss. vol. XI. p. 617 (1925).Google Scholar

§ C.R. vol. 124, pp. 748, 749; vol. 125, p. 16 (1897).Google Scholar

Göttingen Diss. (1914).Google Scholar

* Proc. Roy. Soc. 112 A, p. 642 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* C.R. 125, p. 1169 (1897).Google Scholar