Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:32:02.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the integral Tate conjecture over finite fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2015

MASAKI KAMEKO
MASAKI KAMEKO*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, College of Systems Engineering and Science, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Saitama-City 337-8570, Japan. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We give non-torsion counterexamples to the integral Tate conjecture over finite fields. We extend the result due to Pirutka and Yagita for prime numbers 2, 3, 5 to all prime numbers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 158 , Issue 3 , May 2015 , pp. 531 - 546
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Atiyah, M. F. and Hirzebruch, F.Analytic cycles on complex manifolds. Topology 1 (1962), 25–45.Google Scholar
[2]Baum, P. F. and Browder, W.The cohomology of quotients of classical groups. Topology 3 (1965), 305–336.Google Scholar
[3]Colliot–Thélène, J.-L. and Szamuely, T.Autour de la conjecture de Tate à coefficients Zℓ pour les variétés sur les corps finis. In The Geometry of Algebraic Cycles. Clay Math. Proc. 9 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2010), 83–98.Google Scholar
[4]Kameko, M. and Mimura, M.Mùi invariants and Milnor operations. In Proceedings of the School and Conference in Algebraic Topology. Geom. Topol. Monogr. Vol. 11 (Geom. Topol. Publ., Coventry), 107–140.Google Scholar
[5]Kameko, M. and Yagita, N.The Brown–Peterson cohomology of the classifying spaces of the projective unitary groups PU(p) and exceptional Lie groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 (2008), no. 5, 2265–2284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kono, A., Mimura, M. and Shimada, N.Cohomology of classifying spaces of certain associative H-spaces. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 15 (1975), no. 3, 607–617.Google Scholar
[7]Mui, H.Modular invariant theory and cohomology algebras of symmetric groups. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 22 (1975), no. 3, 319–369.Google Scholar
[8]Pirutka, A. and Yagita, N. Note on the counterexamples for the integral Tate conjecture over finite fields, preprint, arXiv:1401.1620v1. To appear in Doc. Math.Google Scholar
[9]Totaro, B.Torsion algebraic cycles and complex cobordism. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1997), no. 2, 467–493.Google Scholar
[10]Totaro, B.The Chow ring of a classifying space. In Algebraic K-Theory (Seattle, WA, 1997). Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. Vol. 67 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999), 249–281.Google Scholar
[11]Totaro, B.Group Cohomology and Algebraic Cycles. Cambridge Tracts in Math. Vol. 204 (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
[12]Vistoli, A.On the cohomology and the Chow ring of the classifying space of PGLp. J. Reine Angew. Math. 610 (2007), 181–227.Google Scholar