Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:30:51.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the decrease of velocity with depth in an irrotational water wave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

M. S. Longuet-Higgins
M. S. Longuet-Higgins
Affiliation:
Trinity CollegeCambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The following theorems are proved for irrotational surface waves of finite amplitude in a uniform, incompressible fluid:

(a) In any space-periodic motion (progressive or otherwise) in uniform depth, the mean square of the velocity is a decreasing function of the mean depth z below the surface. Hence the fluctuations in the mean pressure increase with z.

(b) In any space-periodic motion in infinite depth, the particle motion tends to zero exponentially as z tends to infinity. The pressure fluctuations at great depths are therefore simultaneous, but they do not in general tend to zero.

(c) In a progressive periodic wave in uniform depth the mass-transport velocity is a decreasing function of the mean depth of a particle below the free surface, and the tangent to the velocity profile is vertical at the bottom. This result conflicts with observations in wave tanks, and shows that the waves cannot be wholly irrotational.

(d) Analogous results are proved for the solitary wave.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , July 1953 , pp. 552 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bagnold, R. A.J. Instn civ. Engrs, 27 (1947), 447–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Lamb, H.Hydrodynamics, 6th ed. (Cambridge, 1932).Google Scholar
(3)Longuet-Higgins, M. S.Phil. Trans. A, 243 (1950), 1–35.Google Scholar
(4)Longuet-Higgins, M. S.Phil. Trans. A (in the Press).Google Scholar
(5)Longuet-Higgins, M. S. and Ursell, F.Nature, Lond., 162 (1948), 700.Google Scholar
(6)Miche, M.Ann. Ponts Chauss. 114 (1944), 25–78.Google Scholar
(7)Rayleigh, Lord. Phil. Mag. (5), 1 (1876), 257–79.Google Scholar
(8)Stokes, G. G.Trans. Camb. phil. Soc. 8 (1847), 441–60.Google Scholar
(9)Titchmarsh, E. C.Theory of functions, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 1939), p. 113.Google Scholar
(10)Ursell, F.Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 49 (1953), 145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar