Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:08:53.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On deformation spaces of nonuniform hyperbolic lattices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2016

SUNGWOON KIM  and
INKANG KIM
SUNGWOON KIM
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea. e-mail: [email protected]
INKANG KIM
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, Republic of Korea. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let Γ be a nonuniform lattice acting on the real hyperbolic n-space. We show that in dimension greater than or equal to 4, the volume of a representation is constant on each connected component of the representation variety of Γ in SO(n, 1). Furthermore, in dimensions 2 and 3, there is a semialgebraic subset of the representation variety such that the volume of a representation is constant on connected components of the semialgebraic subset. Combining our approach with the main result of [2] gives a new proof of the local rigidity theorem for nonuniform hyperbolic lattices and the analogue of Soma's theorem, which shows that the number of orientable hyperbolic manifolds dominated by a closed, connected, orientable 3-manifold is finite, for noncompact 3-manifolds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 161 , Issue 2 , September 2016 , pp. 283 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bucher, M., Burger, M., Frigerio, R., Iozzi, A., Pagliantini, C. and Pozzetti, M. B. Isometric embeddings in bounded cohomology. J. Topol. Anal. 6 (2014), no. 1, 1–25.Google Scholar
[2] Bucher, M., Burger, M. and Iozzi, A. A dual interpretation of the Gromov–Thurston proof of Mostow rigidity and volume rigidity for representations of hyperbolic lattices. In: Trends in Harmonic Analysis, pp. 47–76, Springer INdAM Ser., 3 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2013).Google Scholar
[3] Bucher, M., Burger, M. and Iozzi, A. Integrality of volumes of representations. arXiv:1407.0562v1 [math.GT].Google Scholar
[4] Besson, G., Courtois, G. and Gallot, S. Inégalités de Milnor–Wood géométriques. Comment. Math. Helv. 82 (2007), no. 4, 753–803.Google Scholar
[5] Burger, M., Iozzi, A. and Wienhard, A. Surface group representations with maximal Toledo invariant. Ann. of Math. (2) 172 (2010), no. 1, 517–566.Google Scholar
[6] Bucher, M., Kim, I. and Kim, S. Proportionality principle for the simplicial volume of families of ℚ-rank 1 locally symmetric spaces. Math. Z. 276 (2014), no. 1-2, 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Calabi, E. On compact Riemannian manifolds with constant curvature. I. In: Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. III (1961), pp. 155–180 (AMS, Providence, RI).Google Scholar
[8] Dunfield, N. M. Cyclic surgery, degrees of maps of character curves, and volume rigidity for hyperbolic manifolds. Invent. Math. 136 (1999), no. 3, 623–657.Google Scholar
[9] Francaviglia, S. Hyperbolic volume of representations of fundamental groups of cusped 3-manifolds. Int. Math. Res. Not. (2004), no. 9, 425–459.Google Scholar
[10] Francaviglia, S. and Klaff, B. Maximal volume representation are Fuchsian. Geom. Dedicata 117 (2006), 111–124.Google Scholar
[11] Guichardet, A. Cohomologie des Groupes Topologiques et des Algèbres de Lie (CEDIC, Paris, 1980).Google Scholar
[12] Goldman, W. M. Topological components of spaces of representations. Invent. Math. 93 (1988), no. 3, 557–607.Google Scholar
[13] Hodgson, C. Degeneration and regeneration of geometric structures on three-manifolds. PhD. thesis (Princeton University, 1986).Google Scholar
[14] Kapovich, M. On dynamics of pseudo-Anosov homeomorphisms on representation varieties of surface groups. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 23 (1998), no. 1, 83–100.Google Scholar
[15] Kim, S. On the equivalence of the definitions of volume of representations. Pacific J. Math. 280 (2016), no. 1, 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Kim, S. and Kim, I. Volume invariant and maximal representations of discrete subgroups of Lie groups. Math. Z. 276 (2014), no. 3-4, 1189–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Kim, S. and Kuessner, T. Simplicial volume of compact manifolds with amenable boundary. J. Topol. Anal. 7 (2015), no. 1, 23–46.Google Scholar
[18] Kneser, H. Der Simplexinhalt in der nichteuklidischen Geometrie. Deutsche Math. 1 (1936), 337–340.Google Scholar
[19] Löh, C. ℓ1-Homology and Simplicial Volume. PhD thesis. (WWU Münster, 2007), http://www.mathematik.uni-regensburg.de/loeh/theses/thesis.pdf.Google Scholar
[20] Milnor, J. The Schläfli differential equality. In Collected Papers, vol. 1. (Publish or Perish, 1994).Google Scholar
[21] Monod, N. Continuous Bounded Cohomology of Locally Compact Groups. Lecture Notes in Math. 1758 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Moore, C. C. Amenable subgroups of semisimple groups and proximal flows. Israel J. Math. 34 (1979), no. 1-2, 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] Munkres, J. R. Elementary Differential Topology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1966).Google Scholar
[24] Neumann, W. D. and Yang, J. Bloch invariants of hyperbolic 3-manifolds. Duke Math. J. 96 (1999), no. 1, 29–59.Google Scholar
[25] Reznikov, A. Rationality of secondary classes. J. Differential Geom. 43 (1996), no. 3, 674–692.Google Scholar
[26] Soma, T. Non-Zero degree maps to hyperbolic 3-manifolds. J. Differential Geom. 49 (1998), no. 3, 517–546.Google Scholar
[27] Thurston, W. Geometry and Topology of 3-Manifolds. Lecture Notes, Princeton, (1978). http://library.msri.org/books/gt3m.Google Scholar
[28] Toledo, D. Representations of surface groups in complex hyperbolic space. J. Differential Geom. 29 (1989), no. 1, 125–133.Google Scholar
[29] Vinberg, E. B. editor. Geometry II, Geometry of Spaces of Constant Curvature Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences vol. 29 (Springer, 1993).Google Scholar
[30] Weil, A. On discrete subgroups of Lie groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 72 (1960), 369–384.Google Scholar
[31] Weil, A. On discrete subgroups of Lie groups II. Ann. of Math. (2) 75 (1962), 578–602.Google Scholar
[32] Zickert, C. K. The volume and Chern–Simon invariant of a representation. Duke Math. J. 150 (2009), no. 3, 489–532.Google Scholar