Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:37:21.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a non-symmetric theory of the pure gravitational field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

D. W. Sciama
D. W. Sciama
Affiliation:
Trinity CollegeCambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is suggested, on heuristic grounds, that the energy-momentum tensor of a material field with non-zero spin and non-zero rest-mass should be non-symmetric. The usual relationship between energy-momentum tensor and gravitational potential then implies that the latter should also be a non-symmetric tensor. This suggestion has nothing to do with unified field theory; it is concerned with the pure gravitational field.

A theory of gravitation based on a non-symmetric potential is developed. Field equations are derived, and a study is made of Rosenfeld identities, Bianchi identities, angular momentum and the equations of motion of test particles. These latter equations represent the geodesics of a Riemannian space whose contravariant metric tensor is gij–, in agreement with a result of Lichnerowicz(9) on the bicharacteristics of the Einstein–Schrödinger field equations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , January 1958 , pp. 72 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Belinfante, F.J. Physica, 7 (1940), 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Bergmann, P. G. and Schiller, R.Phys. Rev. 89 (1953), 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Bergmann, P. G. and Thomson, R.Phys. Rev. 89 (1953), 400.Google Scholar
(4)Corson, E. M.Introduction to tensors, spinors, and relativistic wave-equations (London, 1953).Google Scholar
(5)Dirac, P. A. M.The principles of quantum mechanics, 3rd ed. (Oxford, 1947).Google Scholar
(6)Einstein, A.S.B. preuss. Akad. Wiss. 2 (1916), 1111.Google Scholar
(7)Einstein, A.The meaning of relativity, 5th ed. (London, 1951).Google Scholar
(8)Einstein, A. and Kaufmann, B.Ann. Math., Princeton, 62 (1955), 128.Google Scholar
(9)Lichnerowicz, A.J. Rat. Mech. Anal. 3 (1954), 487.Google Scholar
(10)Papapetrou, A.Phil. Mag. 40 (1949), 937.Google Scholar
(11)Papapetrou, A.Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 209 (1951), 248.Google Scholar
(12)Pauli, W.Rev. Mod. Phys. 13 (1941), 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Robinson, I. Private communication.Google Scholar
(14)Rosenfeld, L.Acad. Roy. Belgique, 18 (1940), no. 6.Google Scholar
(15)Schrödinger, E.Proc. R. Irish Acad. 51 (1948), 205.Google Scholar
(16)Schrödinger, E.Space-time structure (Cambridge, 1950).Google Scholar
(17)Wentzel, G.Quantum theory of fields (New York, 1949).Google Scholar
(18)Weyl, H.Phys. Rev. 77 (1950), 699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19)Weyssenhoff, J. and Raabe, A.Acta Phys. Pol. 9 (1947), 7.Google Scholar