Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:17:08.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Normal forms for linear Hamiltonian vector fields commuting with the action of a compact Lie group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Ian Melbourne
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204-3476, U.S.A.
Michael Dellnitz
Affiliation:
Institut für Angewandte Mathematik, Universität Hamburg, D-W-200 Hamburg 13, Germany

Abstract

We obtain normal forms for infinitesimally symplectic matrices (or linear Hamiltonian vector fields) that commute with the symplectic action of a compact Lie group of symmetries. In doing so we extend Williamson's theorem on normal forms when there is no symmetry present.

Using standard representation-theoretic results the symmetry can be factored out and we reduce to finding normal forms over a real division ring. There are three real division rings consisting of the real, complex and quaternionic numbers. Of these, only the real case is covered in Williamson's original work.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Burgoyne, N. and Cushman, R.. Normal forms for real linear Hamiltonian systems, in ‘The 1976 NASA Conference on Geometric Control Theory’, pp. 483–529, Math. Sci. Press, Brookline, Mass., 1977.Google Scholar
[2]Burgoyne, N. and Cushman, R.. Conjugacy classes in linear groups. J. Algebra 44 (1977), 339362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Dellnitz, M., Melbourne, I. and Marsden, J. E.. Generic bifurcation of Hamiltonian vector fields with symmetry. Nonlinearity 5 (1992), 979996.Google Scholar
[4]Galin, D. M.. Versal deformations of linear Hamiltonian systems. AMS Transl. (2) 118 (1982), 112. (Trudy Sem. Petrovsk. 1 (1975), 63–74.)Google Scholar
[5]Golubitsky, M. and Stewart, I.. Generic bifurcation of Hamiltonian systems with symmetry. Physica D 24 (1987), 391405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Golubitsky, M., Stewart, I. and Schaeffer, P.. Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory, vol. 2 (Springer, 1988).Google Scholar
[7]Guillemin, V. and Sternberg, S.. Symplectic Techniques in Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
[8]Koçak, H.. Normal forms and versal deformations of linear Hamiltonian systems. J. Diff. Eq. 51(1984), 359407.Google Scholar
[9]Laub, A. J. and Meyer, K.. Canonical forms for symplectic and Hamiltonian matrices. Celestial Mech. 9 (1974), 213238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]MacDonald, I.. Algebraic structure of Lie groups. In Representation Theory of Lie Groups (ed. Atiyah, M. F.). London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes 34 (Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
[11]Melbourne, I.. Versal unfoldings of equivariant linear Hamiltonian vector fields. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., submitted.Google Scholar
[12]Montaldi, J., Roberts, M. and Stewart, I.. Periodic solutions near equilibria of symmetric Hamiltonian systems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 325 (1988), 237293.Google Scholar
[13]Wall, G. E.. On the conjugacy classes in the unitary, symplectic and orthogonal groups. J. Austral. Math. Soc. 3 (1963), 162.Google Scholar
[14]Wan, Y. H.. Normal forms of infinitesimally symplectic transformations with involutions. Preprint, SUNY at Buffalo, 1989.Google Scholar
[15]Wan, Y. H.. Versal deformations of infinitesimally symplectic transformations with antisymplectic involutions. In Singularity Theory and its Applications, Part II (eds. Roberts, M. and Stewart, I.) Lecture Notes in Math. 1463Springer, Berlin, 1991.Google Scholar
[16]Wiegmann, N. A.. Some theorems on matrices with real quaternionic elements. Canad. J.Math. 7 (1955), 191201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Williamson, J.. On the algebraic problem concerning the normal forms of linear dynamical systems. Amer. J. Math. 58 (1936), 141163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar