Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:21:58.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-splitting of prime divisors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Judith D. Sally
Judith D. Sally
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Northwestern University, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this study of complete, or integrally closed, ideals in a two-dimensional regular local ring (R, m), Zariski established a one-to-one correspondence between prime divisors of R, i.e. rank 1 discrete valuations v birationally dominating R with residue field of transcendence degree 1 over R/m, and m-primary simple complete ideals Iv in R; cf. [17] and [18]. In this correspondence, the blow-up of such an ideal has unique exceptional prime and the localization at this prime is the valuation ring of a prime divisor of R. In this paper, we will study such ideals in a more general setting, so we begin by recalling some definitions and background results.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 103 , Issue 2 , March 1988 , pp. 251 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Abhyankar, S. S.. Nonsplitting of valuations in extensions of two dimensional regular local domains. Math. Ann. 170 (1967), 87–144.Google Scholar
[2]Abhyankar, S. S.. On the valuations centered in a local domain. Amer. J. Math. 78 (1956), 321–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Abhyankar, S. S. and Zariski, O.. Splitting of valuations in extensions of local domains. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 41(1955), 84–90.Google Scholar
[4]Endler, O.. Valuation Theory (Springer-Verlag, 1972).Google Scholar
[5]Göhner, H.. Semifactoriality and Muhly's condition (N) in two-dimensional local rings. J. Algebra 34 (1975), 403–429.Google Scholar
[6]Huneke, C.. The primary components of and integral closures of ideals in 3-dimensional regular local rings, preprint.Google Scholar
[7]Katz, D.. On the number of minimal prime ideals in the completion of a local domain. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 16 (1986), 575–578.Google Scholar
[8]Lipman, J.. Rational singularities with applications to algebraic surfaces and unique Factorization. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. 36 (1969), 195–279.Google Scholar
[9]Muhly, H. T. and Sakuma, M.. Asymptotic factorization of ideals. J. London Math. Soc. 38 (1963), 341–350.Google Scholar
[10]Muhly, H. T.. On the existence of asymptotically irreducible ideals. J. London Math. Soc. 40 (1965), 99–107.Google Scholar
[11]Nagata, M.. Local Rings (Interscience, 1962).Google Scholar
[12]Ostrowski, A.. Untersuchungen Zur arithmetischen Theorie der Körper. Math. Z. 39 (1934), 269–404.Google Scholar
[13]Rees, D.. Valuations associated with ideals. II. J. London Math. Soc. 31(1956), 221–228.Google Scholar
[14]Sally, J. D.. One-fibered ideals. Proc. Microprogram on Commutative Algebra, M.S.R.I., 1987 (to appear).Google Scholar
[15]Sally, J. D.. Regular overrings of regular local rings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 171 (1972), 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Samuel, P.. Some asymptotic properties of powers of ideals. Ann. of Math. 56 (1952), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Zariski, O.. Polynomial ideals defined by infinitely many base points. Amer. J. Math. 60 (1938), 151–204.Google Scholar
[18]Zariski, O. and Samuel, P.. Commutative Algebra, vol. II (Van Nostrand, 1960).Google Scholar