Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:15:37.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moving forcing effects in a two-phase medium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Lim Chee-Seng
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur

Abstract

An unbounded two-phase medium is transmitting radiation from a group of uniformly moving, two-dimensional forcing effects. The emission process is governed by two matrix differential equations for both interior regions, accompanied by a common set of boundary conditions along the communicating interface. Anticipating possible hyperbolic modes, in co-existence with elliptic modes during the eventual steady state, a radiation condition is initially applied. This radiation condition, together with a particular boundedness criterion, decides the precise number of boundary equations required. An exact solution is established for moving forcing effects having arbitrary spatial distributions. Those aligned along the interface correspond to sheet sources. Superimposed are additional source sheets virtually induced by the action of internal forcing effects, converting their combined incident field into reflection and refraction. A peculiar feature is the invariant propagation along characteristics of certain hyperbolic modes, under the essential presence of elliptic modes, as real Hilbert transforms (in the sense of principal values) of a net interface source density.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bers, L., John, F. and Schechter, M.Partial Differential Equations (New York, Interscience, 1964).Google Scholar
(2)Buchwald, V. T.Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. A 253 (1959), 563.Google Scholar
(3)Chee-Seng, L.Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. A 323 (1971), 555.Google Scholar
(4)Chee-Seng, L.J. Fluid Mech. 55 (1972), 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Chee-Seng, L.Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 26 (1973), 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Chee-Seng, L.Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. To appear.Google Scholar
(7)Chu, C. K.Phys. Fluids 7 (1964), 707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Courant, R. and Hilbert, D.Methods of Mathematical Physics, volume 2 (New York, Interscience, 1962).Google Scholar
(9)Crapper, G. D.Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. A 282 (1964), 547.Google Scholar
(10)Crapper, G. D.J. Inst. Math. Appl. 1 (1965), 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Crapper, G. D.J. Fluid Mech. 29 (1967), 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Williams, J. E. FfowcsPhilos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 255 (1963), 469.Google Scholar
(13)Williams, J. E. FfowcsAnn. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1 (1969), 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Williams, J. E. Ffowcs and Hawkings, D. L.Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 264 (1969), 321.Google Scholar
(15)Finkbeiner, D. T.Matrices and Linear Transformations (Tokyo, Charles E. Tuttle, 1960).Google Scholar
(16)Kulikovskiy, A. G. and Lyubimov, G. A.Magnetohydrodynamics (Reading, Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley, 1965).Google Scholar
(17)Liénard, A.L'Éclairage Électrique. 1898.Google Scholar
(18)Lighthill, M. J.Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 252 (1960), 397.Google Scholar
(19)Lighthtll, M. J.J. Inst. Math. Appl. 1 (1965), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20)Lighthill, M. J.J. Fluid Mech. 27 (1967), 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(21)Lowson, M. V.Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. A 286 (1965), 559.Google Scholar
(22)Nigam, S. D. and Nigam, P. D.Proc. Soy. Soc. Ser. A 272 (1963), 529.Google Scholar
(23)Savage, M. D.J. Plasma Phys. 1 (1967), 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(24)Sears, W. R. and Resler, E. L.J. Fluid Mech. 5 (1959), 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(25)Sears, W. R. and Resler, E. L.Advances in Applied Mechanics volume 8 (New York, Academic Press, 1964).Google Scholar
(26)Wiechert, E.Arch. neerl. (1900), 549.Google Scholar