Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:54:37.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Motion of a classical particle with spin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

J. R. Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Sussex, Brighton

Abstract

The helical solutions of the Frenkel-Thomas equations for a free spinning particle are discussed following manifestly covariant lines. For the purposes of expressing the equations in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian form, the definition of spin by H. C. Corben is not entirely satisfactory being frame-dependent. The use of a spin ‘four-vector’ is discussed which makes the solution of the equations shorter and more elegant than that of Corben. Such a derivation necessitates the use of the Frenet-Serret formulae. By basing a Lagrangian formalism on this definition of spin we show that the covariant Euler-Lagrange equations (with multipliers) lead directly to the Frenkel-Thomas equations. Such a derivation is thus an improvement on those of other authors and suggests a more suitable canonical formalism for these equations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bacry, H.Thomas's classical theory of spin. Nuovo Cimento, 26 (1962), 11641172.Google Scholar
(2)Bacry, H.Space-time and degrees of freedom of the elementary particle. Comm. Math. Phys. 5 (1967), 97105.Google Scholar
(3)Bohm, D., Hillion, P., Takabayasi, T. and Vigier, J.-P.Relativistic rotators and bilocal theory. Progr. Theoret. Phys. 23 (1960), 496511.Google Scholar
(4)Corben, H. C.Spin precession in classical relativistic mechanics. Nuovo Cimento 20 (1961), 529541.Google Scholar
(5)Corben, H. C.Spin in classical and quantum theory. Phys. Rev. 121 (1961), 18331839.Google Scholar
(6)Corben, H. C.Classical and quantum theories of spinning particles (San Francisco, Holden-Day, 1968) for extensive references on the classical theory of spinning particles.Google Scholar
(7)Corben, H. C.Classical and quantum theories of spinning particles (San Francisco, Holden-Day, 1968) for extensive references on the classical theory of spinning particles. p. 73.Google Scholar
(8)Corben, H. C.Classical and quantum theories of spinning particles (San Francisco, Holden-Day, 1968) for extensive references on the classical theory of spinning particles. p. 94.Google Scholar
(9)Davis, W. R.Classical fields, particles, and the theory of relativity (New York, Gordon and Breach, 1970), p. 21.Google Scholar
(11)Degroot, S. R. and Suttorp, L. G.Foundations of electrodynamics (Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1972).Google Scholar
(12)Dirac, P. A. M.Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics. Proc. Boy. Soc. Ser. A 246 (1958), 326332.Google Scholar
(13)Dixon, W. G.On a classical theory of charged particles with spin and the classical limit of the Dirac equation. Nuovo Cimento 38 (1965), 16161643.Google Scholar
(14)Dixon, W. G.Description of extended bodies by multipole moments in special relativity. J. Mathematical Phys. 8 (1967), 15911605.Google Scholar
(15)Ellis, J. R.Force and couple exerted on a moving electro-magnetic dipole. J. Phys. A 3 (1970), 251262.Google Scholar
(16)Frenkel, J.Die Electrodynamik des rotierenden Electrons. Z. Physik. 37 (1926), 243262.Google Scholar
(17)Halbwachs, F.Théorie relativiste des fluides à spin (Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1960).Google Scholar
(18)Halbwachs, F.Lagrangian formalism for a classical relativistic particle endowed with internal structure. Progr. Theoret. Phys. 24 (1960), 291307.Google Scholar
(19)Halbwachs, F., Hillion, P. and Vigier, J.-P.Lagrangian formalism in relativistic hydrodynamics of rotating fluid masses. Nuovo Cimento 10 (1958), 817833.Google Scholar
(20)Halbwachs, F., Hillion, P. and Vigier, J.-P.Quadratic lagrangians in relativistic hydro-dynamics. Nuovo Cimento 11 (1959), 882883.Google Scholar
(21)Halbwachs, F., Hillion, P. and Vigier, J.-P.Internal motions of relativistic fluid masses. Nuovo Cimento 15 (1960), 209232.Google Scholar
(22)Halbwachs, F., Sourian, J. M. and Vigier, J.-P.Le group d'invariance associé aux rotateurs relativistes et la théorie bilocale. J. Phys. Rad. 22 (1961), 393406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23)Hughes, J. B.A generalized Hamiltonian dynamics for relativistic particles with spin -I, II. Suppl. Nuovo Cimento 20 (1961), 89111, 148–156.Google Scholar
(24)Lianis, G.The formulation of constitutive equations in continuum relativistic physics. Nuovo Cimento, 66B (10) (1970), 239259.Google Scholar
(25)Nakano, T.A relativistic field theory of an extended particle, I. Progr. Theoret. Phys. 15 (1956), 333368.Google Scholar
(26)Plahte, E.A correspondence between the Dirac theory and classical theories for particles with spin. Suppl. Nuovo Cimento 4 (1966), 291300.Google Scholar
(27)Shanmugadhasan, S.Canonical formalism for degenerate lagrangians. J. Mathematical Phys. 14 (1973), 677687.Google Scholar
(28)Suttorp, L. G. and Degroot, S. R.Covariant equations of motion for a charged particle with a magnetic dipole moment. Nuovo Cimento 65A (1970), 245274.Google Scholar
(29)Synge, J. L.Relativity: the general theory (Amsterdam, North Holland, 1960), p. 14.Google Scholar
(30)Thomas, L. H.The motion of a spinning electron. Nature 117 (1926), 514.Google Scholar
(31)Thomas, L. H.The kinematics of an electron with an axis. Philos. Mag. 3 (1927), 123.Google Scholar
(32)Tulczyjew, W.Motion of multipole particles in general relativity theory. Acta Phys. Polon. 18 (1959), 393409.Google Scholar
(33)Vlieger, J. and Emid, S.On the relativistic dynamics of polarized systems: II. Physica 41 (1969), 368378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(34)Weyssenhoff, J. and Raabe, A.Relativistic dynamics of spin-fluids and spin-particles. Acta Phys. Polon. 9 (1947), 718.Google Scholar