Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:19:50.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecules with tetrahedral and octahedral symmetry

II. Energy calculations and molecular constants for methane, silane and germane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. A. Ballinger
Affiliation:
Department of PhysicsThe UniversitySheffield
N. H. March
Affiliation:
Department of PhysicsThe UniversitySheffield

Abstract

Detailed energy calculations for CH4, SiH4 and GeH4 have been carried out using the Thomas-Fermi approximation together with a nuclear field which is averaged over all orientations about the central nucleus. The energy, including exchange, has been calculated using the unmodified Thomas-Fermi electron densities as variation functions, and in this way bond lengths and force constants for the three molecules have been obtained. The effect of exchange is very marked, agreement with experiment being quite reasonable when it is included in this way.

In order to test the accuracy of this procedure, a scale factor has been introduced and used as a variational parameter. In this refined approximation, calculations have been made for SiH4, thus enabling improved charge distributions to be obtained. Energy curves are also presented for this molecule, showing separately the variations of kinetic, potential and exchange energies with internuclear distance. It is shown that whilst the scale factor has an appreciable effect on the separate energy curves, the total energy is virtually unchanged.

Finally, the reason why the exchange energy is of considerable importance in the theory is briefly discussed, and some observations are made concerning the rather abnormal bonding in GeH4.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Ballinger, B. A. and March, N. H.Nature, Lond., 174 (1954), 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Bernal, M. J. M.Proc. phys. Soc. A, 66 (1953), 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Bowers, W. A.J. chem. Phys. 21 (1953), 1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Buckingham, R. A., Massey, H. S. W. and Tibbs, S. B.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 178 (1941), 119.Google Scholar
(5)Dalgarno, A. and Poots, G.Proc. phys. Soc. A, 67 (1954), 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Dirac, P. A. M.Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 26 (1930), 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Heath, D. F., Linnett, J. W. and Wheatley, P. J.Trans. Faraday Soc. 46 (1950), 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)March, N. H.Acta cryst., Camb., 5 (1952), 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)March, N. H.Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 48 (1952), 665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)March, N. H.Phil. Mag. (7), 44 (1953), 1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)March, N. H.Phil. Mag. (7), 45 (1954), 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)McConaghie, V. M. and Nielsen, H. H.Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 34 (1948), 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Scott, J. M. C.Phil. Mag. (7), 43 (1952), 859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Slater, J. C. and Krutter, H. M.Phys. Rev. (2), 47 (1935), 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar