Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:30:33.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A lower bound of genus of amalgamations of Heegaard splittings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

FENGCHUN LEI
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. e-mail: [email protected]
GUOQIU YANG
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China. e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In the paper, we give a lower bound on the genus of an amalgamation of two Heegaard splittings V1, ∪S1, W1 for M1 and V2, ∪S2, W2 for M2 along boundary components F1 and F2 under some conditions on the distances of the factor Heegaard splittings. A direct consequence is that under some circumstances, g(M) = g(M1) + g(M2) − g(F) holds, and another is that under some circumstances we have a better lower bound.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Casson, A. J. and Gordon, C.McA.Reducing Heegaard splittings. Topology Appl. 27 (1987), 275283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bachman, D. and Derby–Talbot, R. Degeneration of Heegaard genus–a survey. arXiv:math.GT/0606383v3. Preprint.Google Scholar
[3]Bachman, D., Schleimer, S. and Sedgwick, E.Sweepouts of amalgamation 3-manifolds. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 6 (2006), 171194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Hempel, J. 3-manifolds. Annals of Math. Studies 86 (Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
[5]Hempel, J.3-manifolds as viewed from the curve complex. Topology 40 (2001), 631657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Jaco, W. Lectures on three manifold topology. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Kobayashi, T., Qiu, R., Rieck, Y. and Wang, S.Separating incompressible surfaces and stabilizations of Heegaard splittings. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 137 (3) (2004), 633643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Kobayashi, T. and Ruifeng, Q.The amalgamation of high distance Heegaard splittings is always efficient. Math. Ann. 341 (2008), 707715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Lackenby, M.The Heegaard genus of amalgamated 3-manifolds. Geom. Dedicata 109 (2004), 139145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Li, T. On the Heegaard splittings of amalgamated 3-manifolds. arXiv: math.GT/0701395. Preprint.Google Scholar
[11]Scharlemann, M. and Thompson, A.Thin position for 3-manifolds. Contemp. Math. 164 (1994), 231238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Scharlemann, M.Local detection of strongly irreducible Heegaard splittings. Topology Appl. 90 (1998), 135147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Scharlemann, M. and Tomova, M.Alernate Heegaard genus bounds distance. Geom. Topol. 10 (2006), 593617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Harshorn, K.Heegaard splittings of Haken manifolds has bounded distance. Pacific J. Math. 204 (2002), 6175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Morimoto, K.Tunnel number, connected sum and meridional essential surfaces. Topology 39 (2000), 469485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Schultens, J.Additivity of tunnel number for small knots. Comment. Math. Helv 75 (2000), 353363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Schultens, J.The classification of Heegaard splittings for (compact orientable surfaces) × S 1. Proc. London Math. Soc. 67 (1993), 425448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Schultens, J. Heegaard genus formula for Haken manifolds. Preprint.Google Scholar
[19]Schultens, J. and Weidmann, R.Destabilizing amalgamated Heegaard splittings. Geom. Topol. Monogr. 12 (2007), 319334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Souto, J. Distance in the curve complex and Heegaard genus. Preprint.Google Scholar
[21]Guoqiu, Yang and Lei, Fengchun On amalgamtions of Heegaard splittings with high distance. To appear in Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.Google Scholar