Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T19:23:49.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Line-cobordism’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

M. Gate
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department University of Durham, South Road, Durham
G. Whiston
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department University of Durham, South Road, Durham

Extract

The following extension problem is of considerable geometrical interest. Given a compact manifold X = ∂Z the boundary of a compact manifold Z, does the normal bundle of X in Z extend to a line bundle on Z? A related question involving foliations is if X is a compact boundary, is X a leaf of a codimension one foliation on any compact manifold bounded by X? Obviously if it were such a leaf, its normal bundle in the bounded manifold would extend. Reinhart posed both these problems in the language of cobordism theories(1), (2) defining a vector cobordism theory to a deal with questions of the first genre and a foliated-cobordism theory to deal with the second. He was able to obtain complete results in his vector-cobordism theory, whilst the foliated-cobordism theory remains an unsolved problem. Our aim in this article is to extend Reinhart's results on vector-cobordism theory to unoriented line bundles. Whereas in vector-cobordism the Euler number is a cobordism invariant, in the cobordism theory that we shall describe, the modulus of the Euler number becomes a cobordism invariant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Reinhart, Bruce L.. Cobordism and the Euler number. Topology 2 (1962), 173177.Google Scholar
(2)Reinhart, Bruce L.. Cobordism and foliations. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 14 (1964), 4952.Google Scholar