Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:26:58.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Limit theorems for random compact sets in Banach space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Madan L. Puri
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, U.S.A.
Dan A. Ralescu
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, U.S.A.

Extract

The concept of random set, though vaguely known for a long time (possibly since Buffon's needle problem), did not develop until Robbins [25, 26] provided for the first time a solid mathematical formulation of this concept and investigated relationships between random sets and geometric probabilities. Later on (in a different context) this concept gave rise to a more general concept of set-valued function in topology, and applications were also found in several areas such as economics (see, for example, Aumann[3] and Debreu[10]) and control theory (see, for example, Hermes [13]), among others. Recently in two independent formulations, D. G. Kendall [17] and Matheron[21] provided a comprehensive mathematical theory of this concept influenced by the geometric probability point of view. Actually, much of the research in this area falls under the heading of stochastic geometry (see, for example, M. G. Kendall and P. A. P. Moran [18]). The D. G. Kendall and Matheron theories have been compared and ‘reconciled’ by Ripley [24]. In the past few years random sets have been investigated as extensions of random variables and random vectors, and in this framework the problems of deriving limit theorems have received a great deal of attention. This approach is benefiting greatly from probability results in Banach spaces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arrow, K. J. and Hahn, F. H.. General Competitive Analysis. Holden-Day (1971).Google Scholar
[2]Artstein, Z. and Vitale, R. A.. A strong law of large numbers for random compact sets. Ann. Prob. 3 (1975), 879882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Aumann, R. J.. Integrals of set-valued functions. J. Math. Analysis Applic. 12 (1965), 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Billingsley, P.. Convergence of Probability Measures. Wiley (1968).Google Scholar
[5]Byrne, C. L.. Remarks on the set-valued integrals of Debreu and Aumann. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 62 (1978), 243246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Cassels, J. W. S.. Measures of the non-convexity of sets and the Shapley-Folkman-Starr theorem. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 78 (1975), 433436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Chung, K. L.. A Course in Probability Theory. Academic Press (1974).Google Scholar
[8]Ceessie, N.. A strong limit theorem for random sets. Suppl. Adv. Appl. Prob. 10 (1978), 3646.Google Scholar
[9]Cressie, N.. A central limit theorem for random sets. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 49 (1979), 3747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Debreu, G.. Integration of correspondences. Proc. Fifth Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Probability 2, 351372. University of California Press (1966).Google Scholar
[11]Dunford, N. and Schwartz, J. T.. Linear Operators, part I. Interscience (1958).Google Scholar
[12]Giné, E., Hahn, M. G. and Zinn, J.. Limit theorems for random sets: an application of probability in Banach space results. Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. on Prob. in Banach Space, Oberwolfach, Springer Lecture Notes in Math. 990 (1983), 112135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Hermes, H.. Calculus of set-valued functions and control. J. Math. Mech. 18 (1968), 4759.Google Scholar
[14]Hess, C.. Théorème ergodique et loi forte des grands nombres pour des ensembles aleatoires. G. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. A 288 (1979), 519522.Google Scholar
[15]Hörmander, L.. Sur la fonction d'appui des ensembles convexes dans un espace localement convexe. Ark. Mat. 3 (1954), 181186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Jain, N. C. and Marcus, M. B.. Central limit theorem for C(S)-valued random variables. J. Fund. Anal. 19 (1975), 216231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Kendall, D. G.. Foundations of a theory of random sets. In Stochastic Geometry (ed. Harding, E. F. and Kendall, D. G.). Wiley (1974).Google Scholar
[18]Kendall, M. G. and Moran, P. A. P.. Geometrical Probability. Griffin (1963).Google Scholar
[19]Lyashenko, N. N.. On limit theorems for sums of independent compact random subsets in the Euclidean space. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov 85 (1979), 113128 (in Russian).Google Scholar
[20]Mase, S.. Random convex sets which are infinitely divisible with respect to Minkowski addition. Adv. Appl. Prob. 11 (1979), 834850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Matheron, G.. Bandom Sets and Integral Geometry. Wiley (1975).Google Scholar
[22]Puri, M. L. and Ralescu, D. A.. Strong law of large numbers for Banach space valued random sets. Ann. Probab. 11 (1983), 222224.Google Scholar
[23]Rådström, H.. An embedding theorem for spaces of convex sets. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1952), 165169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Ripley, B. D.. The foundations of stochastic geometry. Ann. Probab. 4 (1976), 995998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Robbins, H. E.. On the measure of a random set. Ann. Math. Statist. 14 (1944), 7074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Robbins, H. E.. On the measure of arandom set, II. Ann. Math. Statist. 15 (1945), 342347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Rudin, W.. Functional Analysis. McGraw-Hill (1973).Google Scholar
[28]Starr, R.. Quasi-equilibria in markets with nonconvex preferences. Econometrica 37 (1969), 2538.Google Scholar
[29]Weil, W.. An application of the central limit theorem for Banach space-valued random variables to the theory of random sets. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 60 (1982), 203208.Google Scholar