Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:18:02.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The laminar boundary-layer equation: a method of solution by means of an automatic computer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

D. C. F. Leigh
D. C. F. Leigh
Affiliation:
University Mathematical Laboratory*Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method, very suitable for use with an automatic computer, of solving the Hartree-Womersley approximation to the incompressible boundary-layer equation is developed. It is based on an iterative process and the Choleski method of solving a simultaneous set of linear algebraic equations. The programming of this method for an automatic computer is discussed. Tables of a solution of the boundary-layer equation in a region upstream of the separation point are given. In the upstream neighbourhood of separation this solution is compared with Goldstein's asymptotic solution and the agreement is good.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 1955 , pp. 320 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Goldstein, S.Quart. J. Mech. 1 (1948), 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Hartree, D. R. and Womersley, J. R.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 161 (1937), 353–366.Google Scholar
(3)Hartree, D. R.Aero. Res. Council, Rep. and Mem. no. 2426 (1939, issued 1949).Google Scholar
(4)Hartree, D. R.Numerical analysis (Oxford, 1952), p. 164.Google Scholar
(5)Howarth, L.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 164 (1938), 547–579.Google Scholar
(6)Jones, C. W.Quart. J. Mech. 1 (1948), 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Richardson, L. F.Phil. Trans. A, 226 (1927), 299–361.Google Scholar