Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:36:13.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ideals of the Fourier algebra, supports and harmonic operators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2016

M. ANOUSSIS ,
A. KATAVOLOS  and
I. G. TODOROV
M. ANOUSSIS
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of the Aegean, Samos 83 200, Greece. e-mail: [email protected]
A. KATAVOLOS
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Athens, Athens 157 84, Greece. e-mail: [email protected]
I. G. TODOROV
Affiliation:
Pure Mathematics Research Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the common null spaces of families of Herz–Schur multipliers and apply our results to study jointly harmonic operators and their relation with jointly harmonic functionals. We show how an annihilation formula obtained in [1] can be used to give a short proof as well as a generalisation of a result of Neufang and Runde concerning harmonic operators with respect to a normalised positive definite function. We compare the two notions of support of an operator that have been studied in the literature and show how one can be expressed in terms of the other.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 161 , Issue 2 , September 2016 , pp. 223 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Anoussis, M., Katavolos, A. and Todorov, I. G. Ideals of A(G) and bimodules over maximal abelian selfadjoint subalgebras. J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), 6473–6500, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2014.03.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Arveson, W. B. Operator algebras and invariant subspaces. Ann. Math. (2) 100 (1974), 433–532.Google Scholar
[3] Bożejko, M. and Fendler, G. Herz–Schur multipliers and completely bounded multipliers of the Fourier algebra of a locally compact group. Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. A (6) 2 (1984), no. 2, 297–302.Google Scholar
[4] Chu, C.-H. and Lau, A. T.-M. Harmonic Functions on Groups and Fourier Algebras. (Berlin, Springer, 2002).Google Scholar
[5] Eymard, P. L'algèbre de Fourier d'un groupe localement compact. Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 92 (1964), 181–236.Google Scholar
[6] Erdos, J. A., Katavolos, A. and Shulman, V. S. Rank one subspaces of bimodules over maximal abelian selfadjoint algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 157 (1998), no. 2, 554–587.Google Scholar
[7] Haagerup, U. Decomposition of completely bounded maps on operator algebras. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
[8] Haagerup, U. and Kraus, J. Approximation properties for group C*-algebras and group von Neumann algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 344 (1994), no. 2, 667–699.Google Scholar
[9] Hewitt, E. and Ross, K. A. Abstract harmonic analysis. Vol. II: Structure and analysis for compact groups. Analysis on locally compact Abelian groups. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 152. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
[10] Jaworski, W. and Neufang, M. The Choquet–Deny equation in a Banach space. Canad. J. Math. 59 (2007), 795–827.Google Scholar
[11] Jolissaint, P. A characterisation of completely bounded multipliers of Fourier algebras. Colloq. Math. 63 (1992), 311–313.Google Scholar
[12] Kalantar, M., Neufang, M. and Ruan, Z.-J. Poisson boundaries over locally compact quantum groups. Int. J. Math. 24 (2013), no. 3, DOI: 10.1142/S0129167X13500237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Kaniuth, E. A course in commutative Banach algebras. Graduate Texts in Math. Vol. 246. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009).Google Scholar
[14] Kaniuth, E. and Lau, A. T. Spectral synthesis for A(G) and subspaces of VN(G). Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 11, 3253–3263.Google Scholar
[15] Katavolos, A. and Paulsen, V. On the ranges of bimodule projections. Canad. Math. Bull. 48 (2005) no. 1, 97–111.Google Scholar
[16] Ludwig, J. and Turowska, L. On the connection between sets of operator synthesis and sets of spectral synthesis for locally compact groups. J. Funct. Anal. 233 (2006), 206–227.Google Scholar
[17] Neufang, M. and Runde, V. Harmonic operators: the dual perspective. Math. Z. 255 (2007), no. 3, 669–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Neufang, M., Ruan, Z.-J. and Spronk, N. Completely isometric representations of McbA(G) and UCB(Ĝ)*. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 (2008), no. 3, 1133–1161.Google Scholar
[19] Peller, V. V. Hankel operators in the theory of perturbations of unitary and selfadjoint operators. (Russian). Funktional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 19 (2) (1985), 37–51. English translation: Functional Anal. Appl. 19 (2) (1985), 111–123.Google Scholar
[20] Shulman, V. S., Todorov, I. G. and Turowska, L. Closable multipliers. Integral Equations Operator Theory 69 (2011), no. 1, 29–62.Google Scholar
[21] Shulman, V. S. and Turowska, L. Operator synthesis I: synthetic sets, bilattices and tensor algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 209 (2004), 293–331.Google Scholar
[22] Smith, R. R. Completely bounded module maps and the Haagerup tensor product. J. Funct. Anal. 102 (1991), 156–175.Google Scholar
[23] Spronk, N. Measurable Schur multipliers and completely bounded multipliers of the Fourier algebras. Proc. London Math. Soc (3) 89 (2004), 161–192.Google Scholar
[24] Takesaki, M. and Tatsuuma, N. Duality and subgroups. II. J. Funct. Anal. 11 (1972), 184–190.Google Scholar