Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:19:08.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gleason parts for measure algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Gavin Brown  and
William Moran
Gavin Brown
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
William Moran
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We shall verify Miller's conjectured characterization of parts in measure algebras and obtain also a simpler proof of the main result of (2). The basic pattern of argument follows Miller while the chief novelty resides in the approximation method using Wiener–Ditkin sets which is introduced in section 2.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , March 1976 , pp. 321 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Gamelin, T.Uniform Algebras, Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs N.J., 1969.Google Scholar
(2)Miller, R. R.Gleason parts and Choquet boundary points in convolution measure algebras, Pacific J. Math. 31 (1969), 755–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Rudin, W.Fourier analysis on groupa, Interscience, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
(4)Taylor, J. L.The structure of convolution measure algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 119 (1965), 150–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Taylor, J. L.Measure Algebras, C.B.M.S. monograph no. 16, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence R.I., 1973.Google Scholar