Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:16:38.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generalized interpolation in finite maximal subdiagonal algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Kichi-Suke Saito
Kichi-Suke Saito
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Niigata 950–21, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Non-selfadjoint operator algebras have been studied since the paper of Kadison and Singer in 1960. In [1], Arveson introduced the notion of subdiagonal algebras as the generalization of weak *-Dirichlet algebras and studied the analyticity of operator algebras. After that, we have many papers about non-selfadjoint algebras in this direction: nest algebras, CSL algebras, reflexive algebras, analytic operator algebras, analytic crossed products and so on. Since the notion of subdiagonal algebras is the analogue of weak *-Dirichlet algebras, subdiagonal algebras have many fruitful properties from the theory of function algebras. Thus, we have several attempts in this direction: Beurling–Lax–Halmos theorem for invariant subspaces, maximality, factorization theorem and so on.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 117 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 11 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arveson, W. B.. Analyticity in operator algebras. Amer. J. Math. 89 (1967), 578–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Douglas, R. G.. Banach Algebra Techniques in Operator Theory (Academic Press, 1972).Google Scholar
[3]Exel, R.. Maximal subdiagonal algebras. Amer. J. Math. 110 (1988), 775–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Imina, Y. and Saito, K.-S.. Hankel operators associated with analytic crossed products. Bull. Canad. Math. 37 (1994), 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Lax, P. D.. Translation invariant spaces. Acta Math. 101 (1959), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]McAsey, M., Muhly, P. S. and Saito, K.-S.. Nonselfadjoint crossed products. (Invariant subspaces and maximality.) Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 248 (1979), 381–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]McAsey, M., Muhly, P. S. and Saito, K.-S.. Nonselfadjoint crossed products II, J. Math. Soc. Japan 33 (1981), 485–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Rosenblum, M. and Rovnyak, J.. Hardy Spaces and Operator Theory (Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
[9]Saito, K.-S.. A note on invariant subspaces for finite maximal subdiagonal algebras. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 77 (1979), 348–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Saito, K.-S.. Invariant subspaces for finite maximal subdiagonal algebras. Pacific J. Math. 93 (1981), 431–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Saito, K.-S.. Toeplitz operators associated with analytic crossed products. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 108 (1990), 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Saito, K.-S.. Toeplitz operators associated with analytic crossed products II (Invariant subspaces and factorization). Integral Equations and Operator Theory 14 (1991), 251–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Saito, K.-S.. A simple approach to the invariant subspace structure of analytic crossed products. J. Operator Theory 27 (1992), 169–177.Google Scholar
[14]Sarason, D.. On spectral sets having connected complement. Acta Sci.Math. Szeged 26 (1965), 289–299.Google Scholar
[15]Sarason, D.. Generalized interpolation in ℍ∞. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 127 (1967), 179–203.Google Scholar
[16]Stratila, S. and Zsido, L.. Lectures on von Neumann algebras (Abacus Press, 1979).Google Scholar