Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:48:26.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enumerative Formulae for Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

L. Roth
L. Roth
Affiliation:
Clare College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The formulae considered in this paper deal with the multiple tangent lines and planes to surfaces in three dimensions; the functional method employed is that of a previous paper, in which a more restricted discussion was given for surfaces in higher space.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 1930 , pp. 43 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 25 (1929), 390–406; this is referred to as F.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† See Salmon-Rogers, , Analytic Geometry of Three Dimensions, II (1915); this is referred to later as Salmon.Google Scholar

‡ Schubert, , Math Ann. 10 (1876), 98;Google Scholaribid. 11 (1877), 347; 12 (1877), 180. See also Kalkül der Abzählenden Geometrie (1879).

§ James, , Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc. 23 (1925), 201; this is referred to as J.Google Scholar

∥ Cayley, , Coll. Papers, vi, 359;Google Scholar Schubert, op. cit.; Basset, Geometry of Surfaces, Ch. ix (referred to as Basset).

Cayley, , Coll. Papers, vi, 582, xi, 225;Google ScholarZeuthen, , Math. Ann. 10 (1876), 446 (this paper is referred to as Zeuthen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* Basset, , Quart. Journal, 42 (1911), 225.Google Scholar

† Cayley, , Coll. Papers, vi, 347.Google Scholar

* See Zeuthen, p. 450; Salmon, p. 314.

† See F. §§ 1, 13; the surface F 7, which is described in § 1, has one improper node, not two, as stated.

* Basset, p. 31.

′ It does not vanish for F 4′ on account of the nodal lines through the triple point.

* Salmon, p. 287; the coefficient −12 should be +12.

† This method, which is used by James, seems to have originated with Voss, , Math. Annalen 9 (1876), 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‡ In this argument, all ε-considerations have been omitted in order to save unnecessary complexity.

* Basset, p. 40.

* For a scroll the multiplicity is only double and the curve counts eight times.

* Schaake, , Proc. Roy. Soc. Amsterdam, 27 (1924), 362–370.Google Scholar

* Its tangent planes along Γ are the tangent planes to F.

† The correspondence given by James (J. p. 223) is misprinted; the coefficient of Z should be 2.

* Salmon, p. 162.

* Salmon, p. 302.

† Basset, p. 39.

‡ Zeuthen, p. 469.

* Basset, p. 196.

* The dual method is due to James (J. p. 216); the coefficient of n4 should be unity in his result.

† Basset, p. 196.

* Basset, p. 283; the coefficient − 11 should be − 12.

* Basset, p. 273.