Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:50:23.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Double Excitation of Helium by Electron Impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

H. S. W. Massey  and
C. B. O. Mohr
H. S. W. Massey
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Independent Lecturer in Mathematical Physics, Queen's University, Belfast
C. B. O. Mohr
Affiliation:
Exhibition of 1851 Senior Student, Trinity College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The probability of excitation of helium by electron impact to the more important doubly excited levels is calculated, and comparison made with the experimental results of Priestley and Whiddington who have observed two lines due to double excitation. The calculated relative intensities and angular distributions are found to be in qualitative agreement with experiment, and reasons are given for the lack of quantitative agreement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , October 1935 , pp. 604 - 608
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

† See Massey, and Mohr, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 140 (1933), 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‡ Bleakney, , Phys. Rev. 36 (1930), 1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

§ Tate, and Smith, , Phys. Rev. 46 (1934), 773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

∥ Priestley, and Whiddington, , Proc. Leeds Phil. Soc. 2 (1934), 491.Google Scholar

Priestley, and Whiddington, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 145 (1934), 462.Google Scholar †† Priestley, and Whiddington, , Proc. Leeds Phil. Soc. 3 (1935), 81.Google Scholar ‡‡ Fender, and Vinti, , Phys. Rev. 46 (1934), 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wu, Ta-You, Phys. Rev. 46 (1934), 234Google Scholar; Cady, , Phys. Rev. 46 (1934), 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† Vinti, , Phys. Rev. 42 (1932), 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† Vinti, , Phys. Rev. 37 (1931), 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† Bleakney, , Phys. Rev. 43 (1933), 378.Google Scholar

‡ Hughes, and McMillen, , Phys. Rev. 44 (1933), 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

§ Nicoll, and Mohr, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 138 (1932), 229Google Scholar; 142 (1933), 320.