Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:25:09.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The disintegration of boron by slow neutrons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

J. C. Bower ,
E. Bretscher  and
C. W. Gilbert
J. C. Bower
Affiliation:
Emmanuel College
E. Bretscher
Affiliation:
Fitzwilliam House
C. W. Gilbert
Affiliation:
Jesus College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Photometrical measurements of the photographic images of cloud tracks of the disintegration of boron by slow neutrons,

have enabled the ranges of both the He and the Li particle to be determined. We find that the He particle has a range of 7·0 ± 0·3 mm. and the Li particle a range of 4·3 ± 0·2 mm. in standard air.

We deduce that the 7Li nucleus is usually formed in an excited state, with energy of excitation of either 0·5 or 0·8 M.e.V. The wide latitude in excitation energy is due to the uncertain state of our knowledge of the energy-range relation for α-particles.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , April 1938 , pp. 290 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Amaldi, , D'Agostino, , Fermi, , Pontecorvo, , Rasetti, and Segrè, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 149 (1935), 522.Google Scholar
(2)Blewett, and Blewett, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A. In course of publication.Google Scholar
(3)Bothe, . Zeit. f. Phys. 100 (1936), 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Chadwick, and Goldhaber, . Nature, 135 (1935), 65. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 31 (1935), 612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Dee, and Gilbert, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 163 (1937), 265.Google Scholar
(6)Feather, and Nimmo, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 24 (1928), 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Funfer, . Ann. d. Phys. 29 (1937), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Haxel, . Zeit. f. Phys. 104 (1937), 540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Kikuchi, , Aoki, and Husimi, . Nature, 137 (1936), 745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Kurtchatov, , Kurtchatov, and Latychev, . Comptes Rendus, 200 (1935), 1199.Google Scholar
(11)Livingston, and Bethe, . Rev. Modern Phys. 9 (1937), 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)O'Ceallaigh, and Davies, . In course of publication.Google Scholar
(13)Roaf, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 153 (1936), 568.Google Scholar
(14)Rotblat, . Nature, 138 (1936), 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Rumbaugh, and Hafstad, . Phys. Rev. 50 (1936), 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Taylor, and Dabholkar, . Proc. Phys. Soc. 48 (1936), 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Taylor, and Goldhaber, . Nature, 135 (1935), 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Walen, . Comptes Rendus, 202 (1936), 1500.Google Scholar