Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:20:43.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A different approach to unbounded operator algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

M. A. Hennings
M. A. Hennings
Affiliation:
Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge CB2 3HU
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When considering *-algebras of unbounded operators, the usual approach is perhaps the one to be expected. One starts with a Hilbert space , and then defines a common dense domain X associated with some *-algebra of unbounded operators on . The algebra is then used to define a locally convex topology (the graph topology) on X, with respect to which the inner product on X is continuous, and this in turn defines a variety of topologies on , which are then studied.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 106 , Issue 1 , July 1989 , pp. 125 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Dubinsky, E.. The Structure of Nuclear Fréchet Space. Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 720 (Springer-Verlag, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Hussain, T.. Multiplicative Functionals on Topological Algebras. Research Notes in Math. no. 85 (Pitman, 1983).Google Scholar
[3]Jarchow, H.. Locally Convex Spaces (Teubner-Verlag, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Lassner, G.. Topological algebras of operators. Rep. Math. Phys. 3 (1972), 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Lassner, G.. The β-topology on operator algebras. Colloq. Internal. CNRS 274 (1981), 249–260.Google Scholar
[6]Lassner, G. and Timmermann, W.. Classification of domains of operator algebras. Rep. Math. Phys. 9 (1976), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Lassner, G. and Lassner, G. A.. On the continuity of entropy. Rep. Math. Phys. 15 (1979). 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Perez-Carreras, and Bonet, J.. Barreled Locally Convex Spaces. North-Holland Mathematical Studies no. 131 (North-Holland, 1987).Google Scholar
[9]Pietsch, A.. Nuclear Locally Convex Spaces. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete no. 66 (Springer-Verlag, 1972).Google Scholar
[10]Reed, M. and Simon, B.. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. I. Functional Analysis (Academic Press, 1972).Google Scholar
[11]Schaefer, H. H.. Topological Vector Spaces. Graduate Texts in Math. no. 3 (Springer-Verlag, 1970).Google Scholar
[12]Schmüdgen, K.. On trace representation of linear functional on unbounded operator algebras. Comm. Math. Phys. 63 (1978), 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Schmüdgen, K.. On topologisation of unbounded operator algebras. Rep. Math. Phys. 17 (1980), 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Schmüdgen, K.. Graded and filtrated topological *-algebras; the closure of the opositive cone. Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. (to appear).Google Scholar
[15]Trèves, F.. Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels (Academic Press. 1967).Google Scholar