Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T03:24:36.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diamagnetism and superconductivity of a collective electron assembly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

William Band
Affiliation:
Yenching UniversityPeiping, China

Abstract

Exchange energy between electrons moving in a conductor is assumed to be such that the mean contribution per electron is proportional to the product of the total current within a defined range and the speed of the electron in the direction of the total current.

The ideal resistance of a conductor can be neutralized by such an exchange energy at sufficiently low temperatures.

The surface of the conductor, and internal surfaces of discontinuity if sufficiently marked, are regarded as sites for two-dimensional resonance states in equilibrium with the three-dimensional resonance states in the metal.

The superconducting transition occurs when, at the critical temperature, the neutralization of the ideal resistance of the surface by-passes the residual resistance of the body of the metal.

At the same critical temperature, equilibrium conditions ensure that exactly the right number of electrons enter the surface states to give the whole metal an ideal diamagnetic susceptibility.

These equilibrium conditions are disturbed by a magnetic field, and the transition temperature is shown to depend on the magnetic field in the observed manner.

The intermediate state is explained as one in which the number of electrons in the superconducting surface states is constrained by a non-uniform magnetic field to remain at an intermediate value which is inadequate to produce ideal diamagnetism.

By regarding either the outer surface or internal surfaces of discontinuity as the only regions becoming perfectly conducting, the details concerning restoration of resistance by a current are well explained, as also are the observed size effects in thin films, and the phenomena of ‘non-ideal’ superconductors among the alloys.

Finally, the observed distribution of superconductors in the periodic table receives a satisfactory qualitative explanation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Schoenberg, D.Superconductivity (Cambridge, 1938), Chap. ii.Google Scholar
(2)Wilson, A. H.Semi-conductors and metals (Cambridge, 1939), § 6–21.Google Scholar
(3)Frenkel, J.Phys. Rev. 43 (1933), 907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Bethe, H. and Fröhlich, H.Z. Phys. 85 (1933), 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Mendelssohn, K.Proc. Phys. Soc. 57 (1945), 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Wilson, A. H.The theory of metals (Cambridge, 1936), § 1–71.Google Scholar
(7)Peierls, R.Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 155 (1936), 613;Google Scholar
London, F.Physica, 3 (1936), 450.Google Scholar
(8)Landau, L.Nature, London, 141 (1938), 688; and (1), p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)London, F.Une nouvelle conception de la supraconductibilité (Hermann et Cie, 1937), p. 66.Google Scholar
(10)Shelnikov, C.Nature, London, 142 (1938), 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Condon, E. U. and Shortley, G.Theory of atomic spectra (Cambridge, 1935), Table 2, Chap. xiv.Google Scholar
(12)Compare with the theory of overlapping bands in the paper on ‘Anomalous Thermionic Emission Current Constants’ by Sun, N. T. and Band, W., Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. (1946), § 3.Google Scholar