Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:51:16.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cyclotomic Galois module structure and the second Chinburg invariant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Victor P. Snaith
Victor P. Snaith
Affiliation:
The Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences, 185 Columbia Street West, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 5Z5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the second Chinburg invariant of a Galois extension of number fields. The Chinburg invariant lies in the class-group of the integral group-ring of the Galois group of the extension. A procedure is given whereby to evaluate the invariant in the case of the real cyclotomic case of regular prime power conductor and their subextensions of p-power degree. The invariant is shown to be zero in the latter cases, which yields new examples giving an affirmative answer to a question of Chinburg ([1], p. 358) which has come to be known as ‘Chinburg's Second Conjecture’ ([3], §4·2).

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 117 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 57 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Chinburg, T.. Exact sequences and Galois module structure. Annals Math. 121 (1985), 351–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Chinburg, T.. On the Galois structure of algebraic integers and S-units. Inventiones Math. 74 (1983), 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cassou-Nogués, Ph., Chinburg, T., Fröhlich, A. and Taylor, M. J.. L-functions and Galois modules; London Math. Soc. 1989 Durham Symposium. L-functions and Arithmetic (Cambridge University Press, 1991), 75–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Curtis, C. W. and Reiner, I.. Methods of Representation Theory. Vols. I, II (Wiley, 1981, 1987).Google Scholar
[5]Fröhlich, A.. Galois Module Structure of Algebraic Integers (Springer-Verlag, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Fröhlich, A.. Arithmetic and Galois module structure for tame extensions. J. Reine. Angew. Math. 286/7 (1976), 380–440.Google Scholar
[7]Hasse, H.. Number Theory (Springer-Verlag, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Holland, D.. Additive Galois module structure and Chinburg's invariant. J. reine angew. Math. 425 (1992), 193–218.Google Scholar
[9]Holland, D. and Wilson, S. M. J.. Fröhlich's and Chinburg's conjectures in the factorisability defect class-groups (preprint).Google Scholar
[10]Kim, S.. A generalization of Fröhlich's theorem to wildly ramified quaternion extensios of Q (University of Pennsylvania, thesis, 1988).Google Scholar
[11]Rogers, M.. On a multiplicative-additive Galois invariant and wildly ramified extensions (Columbia University, thesis, 1990).Google Scholar
[12]Serre, J.-P.. Local Fields (Springer-Verlag, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Snaith, V. P.. Explicit Brauer Induction (with applications to algebra and number theory). Research monograph (1994), 410 pp. (to appear in Math. Monographs, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Taylor, M. J.. On Fröhlich's conjecture for rings of integers of tame extensions. Inventiones Math. 63 (1981), 41–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Washington, L.. Introduction to Cyclotomic Fields (Springer-Verlag, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar