Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:40:21.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Birational transformations possessing fundamental curves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

J. A. Todd
Affiliation:
Trinity College

Extract

On any algebraic variety of d dimensions there exist certain systems of equivalence which are relative invariants under birational transformation. These systems include the canonical systems (Todd(3,4)) which can be defined for each dimension from zero to d − 1, and the systems defined by the intersections of these canonical systems among themselves. It is natural to enquire what is the precise behaviour of these invariant systems under birational transformations. Relatively few results of this kind are known. For threefolds, Segre has recently (2) investigated the transformations undergone by the invariant systems in any algebraic (not necessarily birational) transformation whose fundamental points and curves are of general character. More recently, A. Bassi (1) has obtained by topological methods the relations between the Zeuthen-Segre invariants of two Vd in an (α, α′) correspondence. I have recently (6) discussed the transformation of the invariant systems on a Vd for birational transformations on the assumption that the fundamental points are isolated and of general character.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bassi, A.Rend. di Palermo, 60 (1937), 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Segre, B.Mém. Acad. Royale de Belgique (2), 14 (1936), 199.Google Scholar
(3)Todd, J. A.Proc. London Math. Soc. (2), 43 (1937), 127–38.Google Scholar
(4)Todd, J. A.Proc. London Math. Soc. (2), 43 (1937), 190225.Google Scholar
(5)Todd, J. A.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 33 (1937), 425–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Todd, J. A.Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2), 5 (1938), 117–24.Google Scholar