Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:25:37.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The azimuthal dependence of processes involving mesons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

T. S. Chang
Affiliation:
Universitetets Insititut for Teoretisk FysikCopenhagen

Extract

The elastic scattering of Yukawa's particles, or mesons, by a static electric field is recalculated by considering the scattering as a process in which the incident meson is absorbed and another meson, i.e. the scattered meson, is created, and Laporte's result is confirmed. This method promises an easier handling of the second approximation.

A similar dependence of the angular distribution of the emitted quanta upon the spin of the incident mesons in a process like Y + PN + is found. Thus, the angular distribution contains a dependence upon the azimuthal angle in general. For the reverse process, the angular distribution of the emitted mesons, both longitudinal and transverse, contains also a dependence upon the azimuthal angle, which disappears only when the incident light is circularly polarized.

The writer wishes to thank Prof. W. Pauli for calling his attention to the azimuthal dependence in the problem of elastic scattering and Dr C. Møller for help given during the preparation of the paper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Laporte, O., Phys. Rev. 54 (1938), 905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heitler, W., Proc. Roy. Soc. 166 (1938), 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yukawa, , Sakata, and Taketani, , Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan, 20 (1938), 319.Google Scholar

Yukawa, Sakata and Taketani, loc. cit.

It is needless to say that ψ N, ψ P are only the constant parts of the corresponding wave functions, which in the complete form contain another factor exp(i pN· x/ħ) or exp (i pp· x/ħ).

This signs of one or two terms in (7) are different from those given by Heitler, which are incorrect.