Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:25:27.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atomic rings and the ascending chain condition for principal ideals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Anne Grams
Anne Grams
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee at Nashville, Nashville, Tennessee, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Let R be a commutative ring. We say that R satisfies the ascending chain condition for principal ideals, or that R has property (M), if each ascending sequence (a1) ⊆ (a2) ⊆ … of principal ideals of R terminates. Property (M) is equivalent to the maximum condition on principal ideals; that is, under the partial order of set containment, each collection of principal ideals of R has a maximum element. Noetherian rings, of course, have property (M), but the converse is not true; for if R has property (M) and if {Xλ} is a set of indeterminates over R, then the polynomial ring R[{Xλ}] has property (M). Krull domains, and hence unique factorization domains, have property (M).

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , May 1974 , pp. 321 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Arnold, J. T.On the ideal theory of the Kronecker function ring and the domain D(X). Canad. J. Math. 21 (1968), 558–563.Google Scholar
(2)Arnold, J. T. and Gilmer, R.Idempotent ideals and unions of nets of Prüfer domains, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A.-1. Math. 31 (1967), 131–145.Google Scholar
(3)Claborn, L.Specified relations in the ideal group. Michigan Math. J. 15 (1968), 249–255.Google Scholar
(4)Cohen, I. S. and Zariski, O.A fundamental inequality in the theory of extensions of valuations. Illinois J. Math. 1 (1957), 1–8.Google Scholar
(5)Cohn, P. M.Bezout rings and their subrings. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 64 (1968), 251–264.Google Scholar
(6)Gilmer, R.Multiplicative Ideal Theory (Kingston, Ontario, 1968).Google Scholar
(7)Gilmer, R. and Heinzer, W.Overrings of Prüfer domains. II. J. Algebra 7 (1967), 281–302.Google Scholar
(8)Heinzer, W. and Ohm, J.Locally Noetherian commutative rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 158 (1971), 273–284.Google Scholar
(9)Jaffard, P.Théorie arithmétique des anneaux du type de Dedekind. Bull. Soc. Math. France 80 (1952), 61–100.Google Scholar
(10)Krull, W.Aligemeine Bewertungstheorie. J. Reine Angew. Math. 167 (1931), 160–196.Google Scholar
(11)Mott, J. L. Groups of divisibility. (Preprint.)Google Scholar
(12)Nagata, M.A remark on the unique factorization theorem. J. Math. Soc. Japan 9 (1957), 143–145.Google Scholar
(13)Nakano, N.Idealtheorie in einem speziellen unendlichen algebraischen Zählkorper. J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A. 16 (1953), 425–439.Google Scholar
(14)Ohm, J.Some counterexamples related to integral closure in D[[X]]. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 122 (1966), 321–333.Google Scholar
(15)Ohm, J.Semi-valuations and groups of divisibility. Canad. J. Math. 21 (1969), 576–591.Google Scholar
(16)Roquette, P.On the prolongation of valuations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 88 (1958), 42–56.Google Scholar
(17)Samuel, P.Sur les anneaux factoriels. Bull. Soc. Math. France 89 (1961), 155–173.Google Scholar
(18)Samuel, P.Unique factorization. Amer. Math. Monthly 75 (1968), 945–952.Google Scholar