Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:44:24.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption measurements and the continuous spectrum of β-rays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

J. A. Chalmers
Affiliation:
Queens' College, Lecturer in Physics in the University of Durham, Durham Division.

Extract

1. Many experiments have shown that the natural heterogeneous β-rays from any radioactive source are absorbed according to a law which is exponential for small thicknesses of absorber but which falls below the exponential for larger thicknesses, giving, finally, a quite definite ‘kink’. The positions of these kinks have been measured by the author(1), by Feather (2) and by others. Experiments on the continuous spectra of β-rays (e.g. Gurney(3)) seem to indicate a definite high-velocity limit to the continuous spectrum; and experiments on the absorption of homogeneous β-rays (e.g. Madgwick(4)) show a definite extrapolated range for the β-rays. So one might expect the ‘kinks’ found to represent the extrapolated ranges of the β-rays of highest velocity. The author (1), using the extrapolated ranges of Madgwick(4) and Varder(5), finds this interpretation of the kinks to give values of the end-points agreeing with the direct experimental values of Gurney(6). Feather(2), on the other hand, uses the results of the kinks in certain cases to give an empirical relationship between the kinks and the end-points. Feather's relationship is purely empirical and is independent of any interpretation given to the kinks; for the purpose of using the kinks to find the end-points, Feather's relationship is sufficient, but the actual interpretation of the kinks is of interest. Feather(7) has considered the matter from the theoretical standpoint, and he finds no reason to expect any abrupt discontinuity; he interprets the apparent kink as the limit of the measurable β-ray effect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Chalmers, , Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 25, p. 331 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Feather, , Phys. Rev., 35, p. 1559 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Gurney, , Proc. Roy. Soc., 109, p. 540 (1925).Google Scholar
(4)Madgwick, , Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 23, p. 970 (1927).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Varder, , Phil. Mag., 29, p. 725 (1915).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Gurney, , Proc. Roy. Soc., 112, p. 380 (1926).Google Scholar
(7)Feather, , Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 27, p. 430 (1931).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Eddy, , Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 25, p. 50 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Sargent, , Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 25, p. 514 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Douglas, , Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, 16 (iii), p. 113 (1922).Google Scholar