Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:59:45.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The resolution of monoidal Cremona transformations of three-dimensional space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

D. W. Babbage
Affiliation:
Magdalene College

Extract

A Cremona transformation Tn, n between two three-dimensional spaces is said to be monoidal if the surfaces of order n in one space which form the homaloidal system corresponding to the planes of the second space have a fixed (n − 1)-ple point O. If the surfaces of order n′ forming the homaloidal system in the second space have a fixed (n′ − 1)-ple point O′, the transformation is said to be bimonoidal. A particularly simple bimonoidal transformation is that which transforms lines through O into lines through O′, and planes through O into planes through O′. Such a transformation we shall call an M-transformation. Its equations can, by suitable choice of coordinates, be expressed in the form

where φn−1(x, y, z, w) = 0, φn(x, y, z, w) = 0 are monoids with vertex (0, 0, 0, 1).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Pascal, E., Repertorium der höheren Mathematik, ii 2 (Leipzig, 1922), 1032.Google Scholar

Hudson, H. P., Cremona Transformations (Cambridge, 1927), p. 172.Google Scholar

This transformation is used for the same purpose by Sharpe, F. R. and Snyder, V., “Certain types of involutorial space transformation”, Trans. American Math. Soc. 20 (1919), 185202CrossRefGoogle Scholar (201).

* Hudson H. P., loc. cit., pp. 306 et seq.

Montesano, D., “Su le trasformazioni involutorie monoidali”, Rend. Ist. Lombardo (2), 21 (1888), 579–94, 684–7.Google Scholar

Snyder, V., “On the types of monoidal involutions”, Annals of Math. (2), 25 (1924), 279–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also the paper by Sharpe and Snyder previously quoted.