Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T14:42:26.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quadratic Lagrangians and gauge-invariance in covariant field theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

G. Stephenson
Affiliation:
Department of MathematicsImperial CollegeLondon

Extract

The idea of gauge-invariance in general relativity was first introduced by Weyl(1) who proposed that the field equations of gravitation should be invariant, not only under the general group of coordinate transformations, but also under the gauge-transformation

where is the symmetric metric tensor, is the symmetric affine connexion and λ(x8) is an arbitrary scalar function of the coordinates. In this way it was possible to introduce into the theory a four-vector Ak which in consequence of (1·1) transformed as

such that the six-vector remained an invariant quantity under the gauge-transformation. It was Weyl's hope that by widening the invariance properties gauge-transformation. It was Weyl's hope that by widening the invariance properties of general relativity in this way the vector Ak and its associated six-vector Fik could be interpreted as representing the electromagnetic field. However, no obvious or unique way of doing this was found. More recently (see Stephenson (2,3) and Higgs (4)) gaugeinvariant variational principles formed from Lagrangians quadratic in the Riemann—Christoffel curvature tensor and its contractions have been discussed by performing the variations with respect to the symetric and symetric independently (following the palatini method).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Weyl, H.Raum, Zeit, Materie, 3rd ed. (Berlin, 1919).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Stephenson, G.Nuovo Cim. 9 (1958), 263–9.Google Scholar
(3)Stephenson, G.Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 55 (1959), 375–6.Google Scholar
(4)Higgs, P.Nuovo Cim. 11 (1959), 816–20.Google Scholar
(5)Einstein, A.The meaning of relativity, 5th ed. (London, 1951), Appendix 2.Google Scholar
(6)Schrödinger, E.Space-time structure (Cambridge, 1950).Google Scholar
(7)Buchdahl, H.Quart. J. Math. 8 (1957), 8996.Google Scholar