Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:05:24.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Quantum Theory of the Problem of the Two Bodies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

J. R. Oppenheimer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The problem of the two bodies has been treated on the new mechanics by Dirac, Pauli, and Schrödinger, who have independently derived the Balmer terms. The present paper is an attempt at a more complete solution. In particular, formulae are derived for the line intensities of the hydrogen spectrum, for the photoelectric effect and its inverse, and for the continuous absorption spectrum in the ultraviolet and in the X-ray regions. Also the probabilities of transition, deflection and capture are computed for the collision of an electron and an ion. Numerical values are only obtained, however, for the simplest line intensities. It is hoped to treat the problem in greater detail.

Type
Articles
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , October 1926 , pp. 422 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Dirac, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 110, 501 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† Pauli, , Zeit. f. Phys. 36, 336 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‡ Schrödinger, , Ann. d. Phys. 79, 361 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

§ Kramers, , Intensities of Spectral Lines, Copenhagen, 1919.Google Scholar

∥ Born, u. Jordan, Zeit. f. Phys. 34, 858 (1925).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrödinger, , Ann. d. Phys. 79, 734 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* The intensities of the hydrogen lines have been investigated by Pauli in a paper not yet published.Google Scholar

* I am indebted to Mr J. T. Edsahl for checking these calculations.Google Scholar

† Fowler, , Phil. Mag. 50, 1079 (1925).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‡ Tolman, and Badger, , Phys. Rev. 27, 383 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

§ Kramers, , Phil. Mag. 46, 836 (1923).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† See, for an account of the mathematical methods, Schlesinger, , Differential-gleichungen, Vieweg, 1922Google Scholar, and Whittaker, and Watson, , Modern Analysis, Cambridge, Chap. XIV.Google Scholar

* I am much indebted to Dr P. A. M. Dirac for suggesting this procedure.Google Scholar

* This is impossible if one neglects transitions.Google Scholar

† In this connection see a paper by Born, , Zeit. f. Phys. 37, 863 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar