Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T23:27:23.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Ledrappier–Young formula for self-affine measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2015

BALÁZS BÁRÁNY
BALÁZS BÁRÁNY*
Affiliation:
Budapest University of Technology and Economics, MTA-BME Stochastics Research Group, P.O.Box 91, 1521 Budapest, Hungary. Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ledrappier and Young introduced a relation between entropy, Lyapunov exponents and dimension for invariant measures of diffeomorphisms on compact manifolds. In this paper, we show that a self-affine measure on the plane satisfies the Ledrappier–Young formula if the corresponding iterated function system (IFS) satisfies the strong separation condition and the linear parts satisfy the dominated splitting condition. We give sufficient conditions, inspired by Ledrappier and by Falconer and Kempton, that the dimensions of such a self-affine measure is equal to the Lyapunov dimension. We show some applications, namely, we give another proof for Hueter–Lalley's theorem and we consider self-affine measures and sets generated by lower triangular matrices.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 159 , Issue 3 , November 2015 , pp. 405 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Avila, A., Bochi, J. and Yoccoz, J.-C. Uniformly hyperbolic finite-valued SL(2, R) cocycles. Comment. Math. Helv. 85 (2010), 813–884.Google Scholar
[2] Barański, K. Hausdorff dimension of the limit sets of some planar geometric constructions. Adv. Math. 210 (2007), 215–245.Google Scholar
[3] Bedford, T. Crinkly curves, Markov partitions and box dimensions in self-similar sets. PhD thesis. The University of Warwick (1984).Google Scholar
[4] Bochi, J. and Gourmelon, N. Some characterisations of domination. Math. Z. 263 (2009), no. 1, 221–231.Google Scholar
[5] Bochi, J. and Rams, M. The entropy of Lyapunov-optimizing measures of some matrix cocycles, preprint (2014), available at arXiv:1312.6718.Google Scholar
[6] Bonatti, C., Diaz, L.J. and Viana, M. Dynamics beyond unifrom hyperbolicity. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 102. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005).Google Scholar
[7] Falconer, K. Hausdorff dimension and the exceptional set of projections. Mathematika 29 (1982), no. 1, 109–115.Google Scholar
[8] Falconer, K. The Hausdorff dimension of self-affine fractals. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 103 (1988), 339–350.Google Scholar
[9] Falconer, K. The dimension of self-affine fractals II. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 111 (1992), 169–179.Google Scholar
[10] Falconer, K. Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications (John Wiley and Sons, 1990).Google Scholar
[11] Falconer, K. and Kempton, T. Planar self-affine sets with equal Hausdorff, box and affinity dimensions, preprint (2015), available at arXiv:1503.01270.Google Scholar
[12] Falconer, K. and Miao, J. Dimensions of self-affine fractals and multifractals generated by upper-triangular matrices. Fractals 15 (2007), no. 3, 289–299.Google Scholar
[13] Fan, A.-H., Lau, K.-S. and Rao, H. Relationships between different dimensions of a measure. Monatsh. Math. 135 (2002), 191–201.Google Scholar
[14] Feng, D.-J. and Hu, H. Dimension theory of iterated function systems, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 62 (2009), no. 11, 1435–1500.Google Scholar
[15] Gatzouras, D. and Lalley, S. P. Hausdorff and box dimension of certain self-affine fractals. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 41 (1992), 533–568.Google Scholar
[16] Hochman, M. On self-similar sets with overlaps and inverse theorems for entropy. Ann. of Math. 180 (2014), no. 2, 773–822.Google Scholar
[17] Hueter, I. and Lalley, S. P. Falconer's formula for the Hausdorff dimension of a self-affine set in R 2 . Ergodic Theory Dynnam. System 15 (1995), no. 1, 77–97.Google Scholar
[18] Jordan, T., Pollicott, M. and Simon, K. Hausdorff dimension for randomly perturbed self affine attractors. Comm. Math. Phys. 270 (2007), no. 2, 519–544.Google Scholar
[19] Kaufman, R. On Hausdorff dimension of projections. Mathematika 15 (1968), no. 2, 153–155.Google Scholar
[20] Ledrappier, F. On the dimension of some graphs. Contemp. Math. 135 (1992), 285–293.Google Scholar
[21] Ledrappier, F. and Young, L.-S. The metric entropy of diffeomorphisms. I. Characterisation of measures satisfying Pesin's entropy formula. Ann. of Math. (2) 122 (1985), no. 3, 509–539.Google Scholar
[22] Ledrappier, F. and Young, L.-S. The metric entropy of diffeomorphisms. II. Relations between entropy, exponents and dimension. Ann. of Math. (2) 122 (1985), no. 3, 540–574.Google Scholar
[23] Maker, P. T. Ergodic theorem for a sequance of functions. Duke Math. J. 6 (1940), 27–30.Google Scholar
[24] Marstrand, J. M. Some fundamental geometrical properties of plane sets of fractional dimensions. Proc. London Math. Soc. 4 (1954), no. 3, 257–302.Google Scholar
[25] McMullen, C. The Hausdorff dimension of general Sierpiski carpets. Nagoya Math. J. 96 (1984), 1–9.Google Scholar
[26] Oseledec, V. I. A multiplicative ergodic theorem: Lyapunov characteristic numbers for dynamical systems. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 19 (1968), 197–221.Google Scholar
[27] Peres, Y. and Schlag, W. Smoothness of projections, Bernoulli convolutions and the dimension of exceptions. Duke Math. J. 102 (2000), no. 2, 193–251.Google Scholar
[28] Przytycki, F. and Urbanski, M. On the Hausdorff dimension of some fractal sets. Studia Math. 93 (1989), no. 2, 155–186.Google Scholar
[29] Rokhlin, V. A. On the fundamental ideas of measure theory. AMS Trans. 10 (1962), 1–52.Google Scholar
[30] Solomyak, B. Measure and dimension for some fractal families. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 124 (1998), no. 3, 531–546.Google Scholar
[31] Yoccoz, J.-C. Some questions and remarks about SL(2, R) cocycles. Modern Dynamical Systems and Applications. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004), 447–458.Google Scholar