Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:40:43.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the computation of the Picard group for K3 surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

ANDREAS-STEPHAN ELSENHANS  and
JÖRG JAHNEL
ANDREAS-STEPHAN ELSENHANS
Affiliation:
Mathematisches Institut, Universität Bayreuth, Universitätsstraße 30, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany. e-mail: [email protected]
JÖRG JAHNEL
Affiliation:
Fachbereich 6 Mathematik, Universität Siegen, Walter-Flex-Straße 3, D-57068 Siegen, Germany. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a method to construct examples of K3 surfaces of geometric Picard rank 1. Our approach is a refinement of that of R. van Luijk. It is based on an analysis of the Galois module structure on étale cohomology. This allows us to abandon the original limitation to cases of Picard rank 2 after reduction modulo p. Furthermore, the use of Galois data enables us to construct examples that require significantly less computation time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 151 , Issue 2 , September 2011 , pp. 263 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Barth, W., Peters, C. and Van de Ven, A.. Compact complex surfaces. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete 4 (Springer, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Beauville, A.. Surfaces algébriques complexes. Astérisque 54. (Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 1978).Google Scholar
[3]Deligne, P.. La conjecture de Weil I. Publ. Math. Inst. Hawks Études Sci 43 (1974), 273–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Elsenhans, A.-S. and Jahnel, J.. K3 surfaces of Picard rank one and degree two, in: Algorithmic Number Theory (ANTS 8) 212–225 (Springer, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Elsenhans, A.-S. and Jahnel, J.. The discriminant of a cubic surface. Preprint, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1006.0721v1.Google Scholar
[6]Elsenhans, A.-S. and Jahnel, J.. Cubic surfaces with a Galois invariant double-six. Central European Journal of Mathematics 8 (2010), 646–661.Google Scholar
[7]Elsenhans, A.-S. and Jahnel, J.. Cubic surfaces with a Galois invariant pair of Steiner trihedra, to appear in: International Journal of Number TheoryGoogle Scholar
[8]Fulton, W.. Intersection Theory (Springer, 1984).Google Scholar
[9]Kloosterman, R.. Elliptic K3 surfaces with geometric Mordell–Weil rank 15. Canad. Math. Bull. 50 (2007), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Lieberman, D. I.. Numerical and homological equivalence of algebraic cycles on Hodge manifolds. Amer. J. Math. 90 (1968), 366–374.Google Scholar
[11]Liu, Q., Lorenzini, D. and Raynaud, M.. On the Brauer group of a surface. Invent. Math. 159 (2005), 673–676.Google Scholar
[12]van Luijk, R.. K3 surfaces with Picard number one and infinitely many rational points. Algebra Number Theory 1 (2007), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Milne, J. S.. Étale Cohomology (Princeton University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
[14]Milne, J. S.. On a conjecture of Artin and Tate. Ann. of Math. 102 (1975), 517–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Pohst, M. and Zassenhaus, H.. Algorithmic Algebraic Number Theory, (Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
[16]Tate, J.. Conjectures on algebraic cycles in l-adic cohomology, in: Motives. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 55-1 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence 1994), 71–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed